2020
DOI: 10.47933/ijeir.772514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elma Bitkisindeki Hastalıkların Yapay Zekâ Yöntemleri ile Tespiti ve Yapay Zekâ Yöntemlerinin Performanslarının Karşılaştırılması

Abstract: ÖZET: Yapay zekânın hayatımıza girmesiyle tarım alanında yapılan yapay zekâ uygulamaları oldukça popüler hale gelmiştir. Tarım alanında karşılaşılan bitki hastalıkları üzerinde durulması gereken önemli bir konu olup bu problemin çözümü için yapay zekâdan yardım alınmaktadır. Çalışmada, elma bitkisindeki uyuz, siyah çürük ve pas hastalığına sahip yaprakların yapay zekâ ile tespiti için evrişimsel sinir ağları (CNN) mimarileri kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada kullanılan CNN içerisinde yer alan AlexNet, DenseNet-121, Re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The study obtained 70% and 85% accuracy rates, respectively. Kang and Chen (2020) showed 85% accuracy with LedNet architecture (Aksoy et al , 2020) 98% with ResNet-34 architecture (Gai et al , 2021), it is seen that they have achieved 70% accuracy with the YOLOv4 architecture and 85% accuracy with the YOLOv4-dense architecture. The YOLOv5 architecture, which is more up-to-date, faster and more accurate than other architectures, was preferred in the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study obtained 70% and 85% accuracy rates, respectively. Kang and Chen (2020) showed 85% accuracy with LedNet architecture (Aksoy et al , 2020) 98% with ResNet-34 architecture (Gai et al , 2021), it is seen that they have achieved 70% accuracy with the YOLOv4 architecture and 85% accuracy with the YOLOv4-dense architecture. The YOLOv5 architecture, which is more up-to-date, faster and more accurate than other architectures, was preferred in the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The highest accuracy in AI models was obtained with the Vgg16 model. Aksoy et al (2020) received F1 score values in the range of 97%–98% using AlexNet, DenseNet-121, ResNet-34, VGG16-BN and SqueezeNet1_0 architectures for the detection of diseases in apple fruit. They stated that the ResNet-34 model is more successful than other models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artificial intelligence applications in agriculture have become common with the technology's advancement (Aksoy et all., 2020). In recent years, developments in automation and smart technologies have made production in the aquaculture sector more controlled and efficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this approach, feature extraction from apple and banana images is performed with pretrained VGG-16 and AlexNet models, and then classification is performed with the Support Vector Machine (SVM). Aksoy et al [8] performed disease detection with AlexNet, DenseNet-121, Resnet-34, Squeezenet, and VGG-16 CNN models using apple leaf images and compared the performances of these models. Hassan et al [9]performed disease detection with Inception-v3, InceptionResNet-v2, MobileNet-v2, and EfficientNet-b0 CNN models using leaf images of 14 different plants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%