2016
DOI: 10.1088/0029-5515/57/2/022004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ELM behavior in ASDEX Upgrade with and without nitrogen seeding

Abstract: This document is intended for publication in the open literature. It is made available on the clear understanding that it may not be further circulated and extracts or references may not be published prior to publication of the original when applicable, or without the consent of the Publications Officer, EUROfusion Programme Management Unit,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(79 reference statements)
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high‐pressure fingers in the SOL are partly sheared off by plasma flows induced during the crash by Maxwell stress, leading to the formation of filaments elongated along the magnetic field lines as shown in Figure . Several such bursts are observed, which is in line with experimental observations for long type‐I ELMs . The high‐pressure structures expelled into the SOL quickly lose energy towards the divertor by parallel heat conduction, whereas the heat flux onto the main walls is typically low since the time scale for parallel conduction to the divertors is usually much shorter than the time scale for the filament convection to the wall.…”
Section: Type‐i Elmssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The high‐pressure fingers in the SOL are partly sheared off by plasma flows induced during the crash by Maxwell stress, leading to the formation of filaments elongated along the magnetic field lines as shown in Figure . Several such bursts are observed, which is in line with experimental observations for long type‐I ELMs . The high‐pressure structures expelled into the SOL quickly lose energy towards the divertor by parallel heat conduction, whereas the heat flux onto the main walls is typically low since the time scale for parallel conduction to the divertors is usually much shorter than the time scale for the filament convection to the wall.…”
Section: Type‐i Elmssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…A proper treatment of the heat flux limit will be implemented for future simulations. The ELM duration defined by the time during which significant losses and divertor heat fluxes are observed is about 2 ms both in the experiment and simulations, corresponding to the so‐called long ELMs …”
Section: Type‐i Elmsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, granule injections at a frequency greater than what is required for mitigation could lead to a sharp increase in overall Z eff . While there are instances of improved plasma performance as a result elevated impurity concentration within the pedestal [12], an overaggressive injection size or frequency could dilute the main ion concentration within the burning plasma, thus decreasing the fusion power. To measure ELM triggering characteristics, lithium granules of multiple sizes were injected into EAST H-mode discharges to ascertain their likelihood of triggering an ELM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…JET ITER-like wall ELMs are sometimes followed by an extended collapse phase, called the slow transport event (STE) [22], the presence of which has been proposed to be related to divertor/scrape-off layer (SOL) conditions [23] [24] and to a change in recycling behavior in a W divertor [25] [26] . These STEs are analogous to the second phase of ELM collapse observed at ASDEX Upgrade (AUG) [24].…”
Section: Elm Duration and Slow Transport Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%