2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11227-015-1437-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ELM-based spammer detection in social networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Uma alternativa desenvolvida com o objetivo de detectar variações inorgânicas de valores desses atributos é a geração de modelos de comportamento temporal, explorada por [Benevenuto et al 2010;Gao et al 2011;Jin et al 2011;Lee et al 2011;Yang et al 2011;Tan et al 2012;Yang et al 2013;Zheng et al 2015]. Considerando então dados históricos do usuário, os modelos detectam anomalias e então sinalizam a conta como spammer.…”
Section: unclassified
“…Uma alternativa desenvolvida com o objetivo de detectar variações inorgânicas de valores desses atributos é a geração de modelos de comportamento temporal, explorada por [Benevenuto et al 2010;Gao et al 2011;Jin et al 2011;Lee et al 2011;Yang et al 2011;Tan et al 2012;Yang et al 2013;Zheng et al 2015]. Considerando então dados históricos do usuário, os modelos detectam anomalias e então sinalizam a conta como spammer.…”
Section: unclassified
“…It is important to note that spammers may use anonymisers, making it difficult to trace them. In order to overcome this problem, several social network spam filters have recently been developed [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Social Network Spam Filtering -A Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important features were then used in the SVM classifier for spam detection. Extreme learning machines were used by [18] on a similar dataset. A semi-supervised social media spammer filtering approach was developed in [19].…”
Section: Social Network Spam Filtering -A Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the idea of classification, the researchers have designed numerical form characteristics to identify spam users. The supervised machine learning algorithm can be split into a single classification algorithm and an integrated classification algorithm (e.g., Support Vector Machine (SVM) [3] [8][9][10][11] [13][14], meta-classifiers (Decorate, Logit Boost) [4], Naive Bayesian (NB) [6][9] [11], Back Propagation Neural Network (BP) [16], Radial Basis Function (RBF) [18], Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) [8] [22], K-nearest Neighbor (KNN) [9] [19], Decision Tree (DT) [9] [20], Random Forest (RF) [5] [7][8][9][ [23][24][25][26] and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) [31,32]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%