2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elliptical and circular FRP-confined concrete sections: A Mohr–Coulomb analytical model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the value of e co has some effect on the theoretical predictions, the measured axial strain e co of unconfined concrete was used whenever it was needed in making the theoretical predictions. It can be seen from Figures 9 to 12 that the FE approach provides closer predictions of the test results than Moran and Pantelides's (2012) model.…”
Section: Comparison With Theoretical Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since the value of e co has some effect on the theoretical predictions, the measured axial strain e co of unconfined concrete was used whenever it was needed in making the theoretical predictions. It can be seen from Figures 9 to 12 that the FE approach provides closer predictions of the test results than Moran and Pantelides's (2012) model.…”
Section: Comparison With Theoretical Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…It should be mentioned that the expression adopted for the frictional angle in the Mohr-Coulomb yield criterion employed in Moran and Pantelides's (2012) model is related to the basic angle of internal friction of concrete, whose value is expected to range between 15.3°and 37.5°(i.e. 15.3°ł u be ł 37.5°).…”
Section: Comparison With Theoretical Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering the analysis of rock, soil, and concrete against shear strength, the Mohr-Coulomb criterion (equation 1) can be used to analyse the shear resistance of CGCAB [38][39][40].…”
Section: Shear Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using triaxial tests, many other authors proposed different expressions for k 1 ; for instance, k 1 = 3.5 was proposed by Teng et al [19]. Recent studies (e.g., two of the latest are Moran and Pantelides [20] and Girgin [21]) suggested, to best-fit experimental data, that the value of k 1 should be also assumed as a function of the confinement level and should take into account the influence of the concrete strength on the ultimate behavior.…”
Section: Simplified Model For Square Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%