2015
DOI: 10.1090/proc/12786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elliptic curves with 2-torsion contained in the 3-torsion field

Abstract: Abstract. There is a modular curve X ′ (6) of level 6 defined over Q whose Q-rational points correspond to j-invariants of elliptic curves E over Q that satisfy Q(E[2]) ⊆ Q (E[3]). In this note we characterize the j-invariants of elliptic curves with this property by exhibiting an explicit model of X ′ (6). Our motivation is two-fold: on the one hand, X ′ (6) belongs to the list of modular curves which parametrize non-Serre curves (and is not well-known), and on the other hand, X ′ (6)(Q) gives an infinite fam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
61
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, for E 6 and E 28 , the congruence obstruction is caused by nontrivial entanglements (e.g. Q(E 6 [2]) ∩ Q(E 6 [3]) = Q); the main contribution of the present paper lies in classifying the remaining (genus 0) cases where C E,r = 0 due to composite level congruence obstructions, and in clarifying the role of entanglements in those congruence obstructions.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, for E 6 and E 28 , the congruence obstruction is caused by nontrivial entanglements (e.g. Q(E 6 [2]) ∩ Q(E 6 [3]) = Q); the main contribution of the present paper lies in classifying the remaining (genus 0) cases where C E,r = 0 due to composite level congruence obstructions, and in clarifying the role of entanglements in those congruence obstructions.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In contrast, analogues of Conjecture 1.1 have been proven in the function field case (see [27], which also gives the statement of Conjecture 1.1 over a general number field). The best known upper bounds for π E,r (X) are π E,0 (X) ≪ X 3/4 (log X) 1/2 assuming GRH (see [46], which builds upon [38] and [33]), X 3/4 unconditionally (see [19]), and, for r = 0, π E,r (X) ≪ X 4/5 (log X) 3/5 assuming GRH, (see [46], [38] and [33]) X(log log X) 2 (log X) 2 unconditionally (see [43]).…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In their paper [BJ14], Brau and Jones describe a genus 0 modular curve X (6) whose points correspond to Q -isomorphism classes of elliptic curves, whose 2 and 3-torsion fields are more entangled than predicted making them not Serre curves. The corresponding curves have the property that the field of definition of the 3-torsion points completely contained the field of definition of the 2-torsion points.…”
Section: Overview Of the Proof Of The Main Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [1] Bandini and Paladino determine the number fields generated by the 3-torsion points, degrees and Galois groups of an elliptic curve y 2 ¼ x 3 þ c where c ∈ ℚ*. In [2] the result of Brau and Jones says that the rational points on the modular Fields of a special elliptic curve…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%