Ella Me Ayudó (She Helped Me): Supporting Hispanic and English Language Learners in a Math ITS

Allessio, Danielle; Woolf, Beverly Park; Wixon, Naomi; Sullivan, Florence R.; Tai, Minghui; Arroyo, Ivon

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-93846-2_5

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition, keywords (such as survey, questionnaire, attitudes and students) were used to search each paper's full text. Naturally, this approach did highlight many papers, but most used their surveys to investigate student attitudes to the particular AIED technology being investigated (i.e., they were usually post-intervention satisfaction surveys) [1,9,11]. Other papers used surveys to investigate issues of relevance to teachers, such as tools to facilitate the design of AI-driven learning environments [4] or to automatically generate questions [6].…”

Section: The Gap In the Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

What do students at distance universities think about AI?

Holmes

Anastopoulou

2019

Proceedings of the Sixth (2019) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Algorithms, drawn from Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies, are increasingly being used in distance education. However, currently little is known about the attitudes of distance education students to the benefits and risks associated with AI. For example, is AI broadly welcomed by distance education students, thought to be irrelevant, or disliked? Here, we present the initial findings of a survey of students from the UK's largest distance university as a first step towards addressing the question "What do students at distance universities think about AI?" Responses from the 222 contributors suggest that these students do expect AI to be beneficial for their future learning, with more respondents selecting potential benefits than selecting risks. Nonetheless, it is important to extend this exploratory study to students in other universities worldwide, and to other stakeholders.

show abstract

Section: The Gap In the Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%