1995
DOI: 10.1057/9780230374355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elizabeth Bowen and the Dissolution of the Novel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 Yet, as Andrew Bennett and Nicholas Royle have argued, living in Bowen's writing is itself cinematic. 6 Their observations of the cinematographic existences in Eva Trout (1968) and The Hotel (1927) remind us not only that Bowen's engagements with the cinema are more radical than a focus on topic or technique might allow, but also that this engagement emerges much earlier than is often acknowledged. By 1938, then, there is nothing naive about Bowen's 'Why I Go to the Cinema,' nor about her cinema aesthetic of 'synthetic affects'.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…5 Yet, as Andrew Bennett and Nicholas Royle have argued, living in Bowen's writing is itself cinematic. 6 Their observations of the cinematographic existences in Eva Trout (1968) and The Hotel (1927) remind us not only that Bowen's engagements with the cinema are more radical than a focus on topic or technique might allow, but also that this engagement emerges much earlier than is often acknowledged. By 1938, then, there is nothing naive about Bowen's 'Why I Go to the Cinema,' nor about her cinema aesthetic of 'synthetic affects'.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Ellmann suggests that Bowen's objects even have “neuroses—every house, for instance, has a watchful face; every car a gamut of anxieties” (p. 6). Many critics have noted that the houses and objects are personified and act like living characters, while the characters are objectified and inactive as if they are held hostage by the place (Bennett & Royle, 1995; Cammack, 2017; Ellmann, 2003; Wurtz, 2010). Recently, some critics have sought to explore the historical and political meanings embedded in Bowen's houses (D'hoker, 2012; Tivnan, 2015; White, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When Matchett arrives at the Karachi Hotel to fetch Portia, '[w]e are left', as Bennet and Royle remark, 'with the unfinished movement of being sent towards a strange place and not arriving', 'a sense of movement which is not properly thinkable'. 23 For Bennet and Royle, the open ending reflects a postmodern indeterminacy. Its lack of closure might also be attributed to the novel's uncertainty about history as an unfolding process that Bowen and many of her contemporaries had long anticipated was leading towards war.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%