1987
DOI: 10.2307/2273866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elimination of quantifiers for ordered valuation rings

Abstract: Cherlin and Dickmann [2] proved that the theory RCVR of real closed (valuation) rings admits quantifier-elimination (q.e.) in the language ℒ = {+, −, ·, 0, 1, <, ∣} for ordered rings augmented by the divisibility relation “∣”. The purpose of this paper is to prove a form of converse of this result:Theorem. Let T be a theory of ordered commutative domains (which are not fields), formulated in the language ℒ. In addition we assume that:(1) The symbol “∣” is interpreted as the honest divisibility relation: (2)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It follows from Theorem 5 of [5] that the theory of K * also has elimination of quantifiers. An expansion of the argument in [6] now shows that Th K * is weakly o-minimal, and it can be verified that this theory does not have prime models.…”
Section: 5mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It follows from Theorem 5 of [5] that the theory of K * also has elimination of quantifiers. An expansion of the argument in [6] now shows that Th K * is weakly o-minimal, and it can be verified that this theory does not have prime models.…”
Section: 5mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Dickmann in [6] observes that real closed rings are weakly o-minimal. He also proves that every convexly ordered valuation ring which admits quantifierelimination in the language L Div is a real closed ring.…”
Section: Real Closed Rings Cherlin and Dickmann Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(y 1 , y 2 ) := (x 1 .y 1 − x 2 .y 2 , x 1 .y 2 + x 2 .y 1 ). We also define V := {(x 1 , x 2 ) ∈ K 2 : v(x 2 1 + x 2 2 ) ≥ 0}. Now we can define K as the L R+V -structure with domain K 2 in the obvious way.…”
Section: Notation Conventions and Initial Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Real closed fields with a proper convex valuation ring [13] provide an important example, and the theory was developed in [4,6,7,16,17,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%