“…These photosensitisers are sulfonic acid derivatives of halogenated tetraphenyl bacteriochlorins and showed tumor:muscle and tumor:skin ratios in the 3-11 range [47,[98][99][100]. Our the most promising photosensitizer was named redaporfin (also referred by the code names F 2 BMet and LUZ11) and its PDT efficacy was revealed in the treatment of mice with subcutaneously implanted CT26 colon carcinoma, light-pigmented S91 melanoma and highly pigmented B16 F10 melanoma tumors [14,20,203]. It is currently completing a Phase II clinical trial for advanced head and neck cancer.…”
Section: Photodynamic Therapy (Pdt)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gomer and coauthors reported a tumor margin of 1-2 mm for PDT and a resection margin of 4 mm in surgical excision of the same tumors, whereas Mroz et al applied tumor margins of 2-3 mm [27,43]. We have recently proven that the increase of the illuminated surface improves the PDT outcome [14]. For ca.…”
“…The photosensitizer is administered into the organism and after a certain time (drug-tolight interval; DLI) is excited with the light of an appropriate wavelength matching a peak of its electronic absorption spectrum [14]. As the result of deactivation of the PS excited states (PS*), two main photochemical processes play a key role in PDT: photoinduced electron transfer or energy transfer from PS* to another molecule, e.g.…”
“…A most powerful factor in the elimination of cancers and assessment of tumor response to therapy seems to be the activation of the immune system to recognize and eliminate cancer cells. This anticancer mechanism may be eventually used to improve photodynamic therapy efficacy and safety, and can open a promising path to a new modality of cancer treatment [14]. Immunological aspects of antitumor PDT will be discussed in detail later in this work.…”
“…These photosensitisers are sulfonic acid derivatives of halogenated tetraphenyl bacteriochlorins and showed tumor:muscle and tumor:skin ratios in the 3-11 range [47,[98][99][100]. Our the most promising photosensitizer was named redaporfin (also referred by the code names F 2 BMet and LUZ11) and its PDT efficacy was revealed in the treatment of mice with subcutaneously implanted CT26 colon carcinoma, light-pigmented S91 melanoma and highly pigmented B16 F10 melanoma tumors [14,20,203]. It is currently completing a Phase II clinical trial for advanced head and neck cancer.…”
Section: Photodynamic Therapy (Pdt)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gomer and coauthors reported a tumor margin of 1-2 mm for PDT and a resection margin of 4 mm in surgical excision of the same tumors, whereas Mroz et al applied tumor margins of 2-3 mm [27,43]. We have recently proven that the increase of the illuminated surface improves the PDT outcome [14]. For ca.…”
“…The photosensitizer is administered into the organism and after a certain time (drug-tolight interval; DLI) is excited with the light of an appropriate wavelength matching a peak of its electronic absorption spectrum [14]. As the result of deactivation of the PS excited states (PS*), two main photochemical processes play a key role in PDT: photoinduced electron transfer or energy transfer from PS* to another molecule, e.g.…”
“…A most powerful factor in the elimination of cancers and assessment of tumor response to therapy seems to be the activation of the immune system to recognize and eliminate cancer cells. This anticancer mechanism may be eventually used to improve photodynamic therapy efficacy and safety, and can open a promising path to a new modality of cancer treatment [14]. Immunological aspects of antitumor PDT will be discussed in detail later in this work.…”
“…It is an example of how the dynamics of the interaction between light, a photosensitizer and oxygen can be tuned to increase therapeutic efficacy. The fact that redaporfin interacts with molecular oxygen both through type I and type II photoreactions makes it versatile in the treatment of a variety of cancer cells and tumors, such as melanoma [233,234,242], lung adenocarcinoma [230,232] and colon carcinoma [275][276][277]. It is currently in phase II clinical trials for head and neck tumors.…”
To improve the prognosis of glioblastoma, innovative radiotherapy regimens are required to augment the effect of tolerable radiation doses while sparing surrounding tissues. In this context, nanoscintillators are emerging radiotherapeutics that down-convert X-rays into photons with energies ranging from UV to near-infrared. During radiotherapy, these scintillating properties amplify radiation-induced damage by UV-C emission or photodynamic effects. Additionally, nanoscintillators that contain high-Z elements are likely to induce another, currently unexplored effect: radiation dose-enhancement. This phenomenon stems from a higher photoelectric absorption of orthovoltage X-rays by high-Z elements compared to tissues, resulting in increased production of tissue-damaging photo-and Auger electrons. In this study, Geant4 simulations reveal that rare-earth composite LaF 3 :Ce nanoscintillators effectively generate photo-and Auger-electrons upon orthovoltage X-rays. 3D spatially resolved X-ray fluorescence microtomography shows that LaF 3 :Ce highly concentrates in microtumors and enhances radiotherapy in an X-ray energy-dependent manner. In an aggressive syngeneic model of orthotopic glioblastoma, intracerebral injection of LaF 3 :Ce is well tolerated and achieves complete tumor remission in 15% of the subjects receiving monochromatic synchrotron radiotherapy. This study provides unequivocal evidence for radiation dose-enhancement by nanoscintillators, eliciting a prominent radiotherapeutic effect. Altogether, nanoscintillators have invaluable properties for enhancing the focal damage of radiotherapy in glioblastoma and other radioresistant cancers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.