2020
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/444/1/012040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elimination of microbial pollution of domestic animal excrements using vermicomposting

Abstract: Based on the theoretical knowledge of vermicomposting, a project was realized for the construction of a three-chamber domestic wooden vermicomposter, in which aerobic degradation of three types of animal excrements (cow, pig, dog) using the earthworm Eisenia andrei was carried out. Before laying the individual excrements to the compost batch, the appropriate input samples were taken for the microbiological examination of the biopathogens. After six months, final samples of the final substrate were taken to det… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…was detected in the dog excrement, but not in both piles. Although E. coli decreased in our experiment, in the case of Mudrunka et al (2020) E. coli content did not change (1 × 10 3 CFU g −1 ). They vermicomposted dog excrement with corn meal and decayed grass in outdoor boxes for 5 months.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…was detected in the dog excrement, but not in both piles. Although E. coli decreased in our experiment, in the case of Mudrunka et al (2020) E. coli content did not change (1 × 10 3 CFU g −1 ). They vermicomposted dog excrement with corn meal and decayed grass in outdoor boxes for 5 months.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…content was 3.9 × 10 5 CFU g −1 , and the presence of Salmonella spp. was proven, which is higher, than the values measured by Mudrunka et al (2020), who vermicomposted dog excrement in combination with corn meal and decayed grass. They measured content of E. coli 1 × 10 3 CFU g −1 and 1 × 10 4 CFU g −1 of Enterococcus spp.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation