2013
DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2012.734675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elimination of arsenic contamination from water using chemically modified wheat straw

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Langmuir constant related with rate of adsorption C i (mg/l) initial concentrations of Cd (II) ions The values (R L > 1) indicates unfavorable adsorption process, (R L < 1) indicates favorable adsorption process and R L = 1 indicates a linear adsorption. The values (R L = 0) confirms the irreversible adsorption process [38][39][40].…”
Section: Langmuir Isothermmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Langmuir constant related with rate of adsorption C i (mg/l) initial concentrations of Cd (II) ions The values (R L > 1) indicates unfavorable adsorption process, (R L < 1) indicates favorable adsorption process and R L = 1 indicates a linear adsorption. The values (R L = 0) confirms the irreversible adsorption process [38][39][40].…”
Section: Langmuir Isothermmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…With regard to strict regulations for control and removal of arsenic in drinking water, and limitations of conventional water treatment processes (e.g. generation of toxic intermediates and low efficiencies) looking for new technologies is of great interest [ 3 , 6 ]. Membrane process can be considered as a promising technology for arsenic removal due to its several advantages such as no need to add chemicals, no generation of sludge, ease of system capacity development, separation in continuous mode, ease of integration with other processes, minimum dependency to environmental conditions and capable of microorganisms and solutes removal [ 7 , 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the inverse relationship of adsorption rate and adsorption capacity [42], the dosage of 5 g/L was chosen for later studies on Cu(II) removal. And the similar growth trends for both UWS and AWS implied that NaOH modification did not denature the wheat straw but just increased the reactions sites [34,43].…”
Section: Effect Of Adsorption Conditions On Wheat Straw For Cu(ii)mentioning
confidence: 92%