2013
DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-6-172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eliminating malaria vectors

Abstract: Malaria vectors which predominantly feed indoors upon humans have been locally eliminated from several settings with insecticide treated nets (ITNs), indoor residual spraying or larval source management. Recent dramatic declines of An. gambiae in east Africa with imperfect ITN coverage suggest mosquito populations can rapidly collapse when forced below realistically achievable, non-zero thresholds of density and supporting resource availability. Here we explain why insecticide-based mosquito elimination strate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
139
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
1
139
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[3][4][5] However, LLINs and IRS are poorly suited to tackling the much larger number of important vector species that avoid fatal contact with these products by feeding outdoors, by frequently feeding on animals, resting outdoors or foraging briefly and cautiously within houses when they do enter them. 3 5 6 Thus, for many high-risk populations, elimination of residual malaria transmission is unattainable, even with full universal coverage of highly effective LLINs and/or IRS, using active ingredients to which the local vectors are fully susceptible.…”
Section: Recommendations For Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5] However, LLINs and IRS are poorly suited to tackling the much larger number of important vector species that avoid fatal contact with these products by feeding outdoors, by frequently feeding on animals, resting outdoors or foraging briefly and cautiously within houses when they do enter them. 3 5 6 Thus, for many high-risk populations, elimination of residual malaria transmission is unattainable, even with full universal coverage of highly effective LLINs and/or IRS, using active ingredients to which the local vectors are fully susceptible.…”
Section: Recommendations For Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…arabiensis is considered to be more exophagic and exophilic. 4,[14][15][16][17] The outdoor feeding behavior of An. arabiensis and other vector species complicates control interventions, such as IRS and insecticide-treated bednets, which are used indoors, and some species can shift their behavioral patterns over time in response to interventions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applications of insecticides to houses by IRS, to kill mosquitoes resting on inner surfaces of the walls and roof after they have fed upon the human occupants, are therefore a highly effective strategy for controlling populations of vectors that rest indoors as a matter of preference. Overall, the community-wide mass effect of LLINs and IRS can have a dramatic impact on the population size of stereotypical vectors that depend heavily upon feeding on humans and resting inside houses [35]. However, there are a number of possible impacts that insecticide use indoors could have on mosquito behaviour including changes in biting phenology, the rate of endophagy and endophily.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%