2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-018-4411-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eliminating Gender-Based Bias in Academic Medicine: More Than Naming the “Elephant in the Room”

Abstract: Gender-based discrimination and bias are widespread in professional settings, including academic medicine. Overt manifestations such as sexual harassment have long been identified but attention is only more recently turning towards subtler forms of bias, including inequity in promotion and compensation. Barriers to progress vary across institutions and include lack of awareness, inadequate training, poor informational transparency, and challenging power dynamics. We propose five solutions that the academic med… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
37
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, recognition allows academic communities to institute training to address explicit and implicit bias that might contribute to gender disparities in hiring or promotion. 24,25 Our results contrast with the theory that mentorship networks are major mechanisms for explaining gender disparities. Prior research identified an association between mentor-mentee dynamics and success among careers in the life sciences.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…For example, recognition allows academic communities to institute training to address explicit and implicit bias that might contribute to gender disparities in hiring or promotion. 24,25 Our results contrast with the theory that mentorship networks are major mechanisms for explaining gender disparities. Prior research identified an association between mentor-mentee dynamics and success among careers in the life sciences.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The seriousness is further suggested by the fact that nearly 40% of those reporting harassment have experienced this behavior more than 10 times. This confirms many other studies that have identified high rates of sexual harassment in faculty, 1,2,12,[17][18][19][20][21] residents, 3,5,6,9,22,23 and medical students 7-10, 24,25 and within other specialties. 5,18,26 One meta-analysis indicated a similar rate with a pooled prevalence of 59.5%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…1 Their report highlights key findings of all grantees of the Research Partnership on Women in Science Careers, a National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding vehicle to investigate factors impeding the professional advancement of women in medicine and science. 2,3 The conclusions and recommendations are particularly compelling since these authors have generated most of the academic medical literature on this subject in the last five years.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%