Inequality in School Discipline 2016
DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-51257-4_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eliminating Excessive and Disparate School Discipline: A Review of Research and Policy Reform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
68
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
4
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A report from the Council of State Governments Justice Center pointed to the need for better monitoring of discipline across race, gender, and disability status subgroups (Morgan, Salomon, Plotkin, & Cohen, 2014). The Discipline Disparities Research-to-Practice Collaborative issued two briefs calling for policy and practice initiatives to reduce disparities in school discipline (Gregory, Bell, & Pollock, 2014; Losen, Hewitt, & Toldson, 2014). All of these recent reports were focused on disparities in suspensions, expulsions, and physical restraints; not one mentioned disparities in corporal punishment.…”
Section: Disparities In Prevalence Of School Corporal Punishmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A report from the Council of State Governments Justice Center pointed to the need for better monitoring of discipline across race, gender, and disability status subgroups (Morgan, Salomon, Plotkin, & Cohen, 2014). The Discipline Disparities Research-to-Practice Collaborative issued two briefs calling for policy and practice initiatives to reduce disparities in school discipline (Gregory, Bell, & Pollock, 2014; Losen, Hewitt, & Toldson, 2014). All of these recent reports were focused on disparities in suspensions, expulsions, and physical restraints; not one mentioned disparities in corporal punishment.…”
Section: Disparities In Prevalence Of School Corporal Punishmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In past years, SCP received little attention from researchers or government agencies, particularly in comparison to other forms of school discipline such as suspensions and expulsions (Losen, Hewitt, & Toldson, 2014; Smith & Harper, 2015; U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Department of Education, 2014; U.S.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these responses may have represented a positive approach to addressing a student's mental health, they also located the solution to the student's issues within the student, served to exclude SGM students from their educational experience, and, ultimately, failed to address the hostile school climates that contributed to the mental health issues in the first instance. While it is critical that we continue to investigate formal disciplinary actions that lead to educational disparities for marginalized groups (Losen & Haynes, 2016), similar to Gregory et al (2016), this study suggests that researchers and practitioners must also expand our understanding of "punishments" to include informal actions that serve to disrupt a student's educational journey and exclude them from the school community. Educators, practitioners, and policymakers should consider transforming school discipline systems that are focused on discrete rule violations and punitive discipline to systems that focus on the totality of the harms to youth that result from victimization and consistently address those harms using more supportive forms of discipline such as restorative and developmental approaches (Day, et al, 2016;Gregory, et al, 2016;Watson, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Documented school discipline disparities also exist for adolescents of color (Gregory, Skiba, & Noguera, 2010) and adolescents with disabilities (Skiba et al, 2006), and evidence is emerging that race and ability status lead to more severe disparities for SGMY of color or SGMY with disabilities (Chmielewski et al, 2016;Skiba, 2016). This research provides evidence that disparities in school discipline result when school administrators impose different consequences for the same or similar punishable behaviors, not because particular students engage more often in these behaviors (Losen & Haynes, 2016;Poteat et al, 2016a), suggesting that issues related to bias and discrimination may contribute to discipline disparities in the United States (Snapp, Hoenig, Fields, & Russell, 2015;Mediratta & Rausch, 2016;Skiba, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation