2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21145.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eliminating error in the chemical abundance scale for extragalactic H iiregions

Abstract: In an attempt to remove the systematic errors which have plagued the calibration of the H II region abundance sequence, we have theoretically modelled the extragalactic H II region sequence. We then used the theoretical spectra so generated in a double-blind experiment to recover the chemical abundances using both the classical electron temperature + ionization correction factor technique and the technique which depends on the use of strong emission lines (SELs) in the nebular spectrum to estimate the abundanc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
183
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(206 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
(310 reference statements)
22
183
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our sample, 19 galaxies (∼12%) at z < 0.48 fall into this category. For these galaxies, however, we can derive a semidirect metallicity taking advantage of the tight relation between t e [O iii] and Z expected for high-excitation environments -like those present in EELGs -from both observations and models (e.g., Masegosa et al 1994;López-Sánchez et al 2012). Thus, we calibrate the relation between t e [O iii] and Z for EELGs (dubbed hereafter the t e [O iii]−Z calibration) using a combination of two independent datasets.…”
Section: Metallicity Derived Through the Direct Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our sample, 19 galaxies (∼12%) at z < 0.48 fall into this category. For these galaxies, however, we can derive a semidirect metallicity taking advantage of the tight relation between t e [O iii] and Z expected for high-excitation environments -like those present in EELGs -from both observations and models (e.g., Masegosa et al 1994;López-Sánchez et al 2012). Thus, we calibrate the relation between t e [O iii] and Z for EELGs (dubbed hereafter the t e [O iii]−Z calibration) using a combination of two independent datasets.…”
Section: Metallicity Derived Through the Direct Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One important problem is that many of the most widely used calibrations based on photoionization models (e.g., McGaugh 1991; Kewley & Dopita 2002) also give systematic overabundances with respect to the direct method. These differences can be up to 0.7 dex depending on the models and the Z range (Kewley & Ellison 2008;Moustakas et al 2010;Stasińska 2010;López-Sánchez et al 2012).…”
Section: From the Three Fields Of Vuds Survey (Cosmos Ecdfsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5.3 and 7). We stress that different strong-line diagnostics and calibration methodologies (e.g., photoionization models versus empirical electronic temperature, T e , derivations) yield substantial systematic offsets in the inferred gas metallicities (e.g., Kennicutt et al 2003;Moustakas et al 2010;López-Sánchez et al 2012;Bresolin et al 2016), reaching values up to 0.7 dex (Kewley & Ellison 2008). Methods calibrated from T e measurements tend to occupy the bottom of the abundance scale.…”
Section: Metallicity Abundancesmentioning
confidence: 99%