Eliciting public support for greening the electricity mix using random parameter techniques

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in

Assessing the Determinants of Renewable Electricity Acceptance Integrating Meta-Analysis Regression and a Local Comprehensive Survey

“…With rare exceptions, income is always positively related to WTP (or negatively related to WTA) for RE or increased participation in RE projects [9,16,28,31,32,34,35,39]. Income is not significant in Ivanova [36,37], Hanemann et al [20] and Kounduri et al [22], while in Groothuis [45], the correlation was negative, indicating that there were no change in attitudes in Mountain View due to the windmill.…”

“…Several types of surveys have been used, though face-to-face interviews represent the most frequent approach among the studies related to the supply side [12,26,33], and some scholars have also used this type of interview on the demand side [16,28,35,39]. Among several elicitation methods, CE [10,12,15,16,18,19,23,24,26,29,33,34] and CV are more intensively adopted among researchers. In the CV approach, the open-ended elicitation method has been used by Mirasgedis et al [25], while the single bounded elicitation method has been used by Ivanona [36,37], Batley et al [13,14] and Zoric and Hrovatin [39].…”

“…Type of respondent can be an individual, such as Alvarez-Farizo and Hanley [12], Batley et al [13,14], Bergmann et al [15], Borchers et al [16], Botetzagias et al [17], Byrnes et al [18], Ek and Matti [10]; Goett et al [19], Groothuis et al [9], Hanemann et al [20], Hansla et al [21], Koundouri et al [22], Meyerhoff et al [23], Meyerhoff [24], Mirasgedis et al [25], Strazzera et al [26] and Zhang and Wu [27]; the head of family [28] or the homeowner [29] but scholars often refer to the "family" as a "unified" research unit, such as Bigerna and Polinori [30,31], Bollino [32], Dimitropoulos and Kontoleon [33], Grösche and Schröder [34], Kim et al [35], Ivanova [36,37], Nomura and Akay [38] and Zorić and Hrovatin [39].…”

“…Several reviewed papers proposed a policy scenario, incorporating clear environmental targets, such as Batley et al [13,14], Bergmann et al [15], Bigerna and Polinori [30,31], Bollino [32], Grösche and Schröder [34], Kim et al [35], Koundouri et al [22], Ivanova [36,37] and Yoo and Kwak [28].…”

Germany’s Energiewende: A Tale of Increasing Costs and Decreasing Willingness-To-Pay

“…The first, which was also employed by GRÖSCHE andSCHRÖDER (2011) andVANCE (2016), uses an open-ended question that asks households to provide their WTP for electricity that is exclusively generated from renewable energy technologies.…”