Advances in Databases: Concepts, Systems and Applications
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-71703-4_47
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eliciting Matters – Controlling Skyline Sizes by Incremental Integration of User Preferences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There can be partial ordering on categorical attributes. [2,3,4,6,5,15,14,25] consider partially-ordered categorical attributes. In [2,3], each partially-ordered attribute is transformed into two-integer attributes so that conventional skyline algorithms can be applied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There can be partial ordering on categorical attributes. [2,3,4,6,5,15,14,25] consider partially-ordered categorical attributes. In [2,3], each partially-ordered attribute is transformed into two-integer attributes so that conventional skyline algorithms can be applied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [15], a user or a customer can specify some values in nominal attributes as an equivalence class to denote the same "importance" for those values. [14] is an extension of [15]. In [14], whenever a user finds that there are a lot of irrelevant results for a query, s/he can modify the query by adding more conditions so that the result set is smaller to suit her/his need.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, we consider samples with the highest expected pruning cardinality, e.g., 'convertible' and 'sedan' for type, 'red' and 'blue' for color, and 'Ferrari' and 'Honda' for brand. Among these, we decide to obtain a preference elicitation on 'red' and 'blue' first, since its expected pruning cardinality (Theorem 1) is the highest, e.g., 1 2 (60 + 40). Once the elicitation result is obtained, for instance 'red' brand 'blue', for each object with 'red', we can prune out objects with 'blue' sharing the same remaining attribute values.…”
Section: Lemma 4 (Ordering Independence)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These preference models refer that qualitative models are more "intuitive" than quantitative models [11,14], which is consistent with our view. Meanwhile, Balke et al [3,4,1,2] studied how to use incomplete preference information for skyline queries: In particular, [3,4] studied how to identify skylines over user-specified partial orders. More recently, [1] extended the notion of equivalence to include the inter-attribute equivalence, and [2] discussed a sophisticated user interface in the cooperative process of identifying partial orders.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%