“…This ''ambiguity" has led to three related objections: the term is inconsistently defined, it obscures significant behavioural variation, and it is insensitive to peoples who practice culturally unique religions (e.g., Aldhouse-Green and Aldhouse-Green, 2005;Hays-Gilpin, 2004, pp. 13, 89;Kehoe, 1996Kehoe, , 2000McCall, 2007;Tedlock, 2005). Each of these criticisms (which could be applied equally well to terms such as priest) has some validity, but ultimately fail to undermine the analytic utility of shamanism for several reasons (see Whitley, 2001;Womack, 2001).…”