The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1984
DOI: 10.1029/rs019i004p01111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ELF and VLF radiation from the “polar electrojet antenna”

Abstract: First, an approximate evaluation is made of the ELF/VLF dipole moment of the polar electrojet antenna established by ionospheric heating via the use of powerful HF waves amplitude modulated with frequencies in the ELF/VLF range. Then, the theory of reciprocity is used to determine the magnitude of the ELF/VLF waveguide excitation produced by such a dipole immersed in the ionosphere. Propagation under a series of ionospheres ranging from quiet auroral nightime to disturbed auroral daytime is considered. contras… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
65
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
7
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first one, which is in the altitude range 60 km-85 km, is caused by the increasing of electron temperature, and the other, which is in the altitude range 90 km-95 km, is aroused by the increase of electron density. In Figure 5(a), the jumping phase near 77 km cancels out part of Pedersen currents; therefore, the Pedersen currents decrease, and this result is similar to the conclusion in reference [20].…”
Section: Numerical Results Analysis and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The first one, which is in the altitude range 60 km-85 km, is caused by the increasing of electron temperature, and the other, which is in the altitude range 90 km-95 km, is aroused by the increase of electron density. In Figure 5(a), the jumping phase near 77 km cancels out part of Pedersen currents; therefore, the Pedersen currents decrease, and this result is similar to the conclusion in reference [20].…”
Section: Numerical Results Analysis and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The six curves in each panel indicate how the normalized ELF response varies with the duty cycle of the pulse waveform for ionospheric cooling time constants varying from 0.1s h to 30s h . This range of time constants is similar to that calculated for the Hall current in the Dregion of the ionosphere (Rietveld et al, 1986) and the Hall current is normally regarded as the dominant current producing the ELF/VLF magnetic ®eld signatures at the Earth's surface (Barr and Stubbe, 1984b). The response axes in Fig.…”
Section: Rationale For Modulation Waveformsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…14 together with below by powerful HF waves modulated at ELF (3 kHz). They computed the time constants for the Hall current in preference to the Pedersen current as the Hall current had been shown to produce the dominant integrated dipole moment in studies used to determine the eective excitation of the Earth-ionosphere-waveguide by ELF current sources in the ionosphere produced by amplitude modulated HF heating (Barr and Stubbe, 1984b). In Fig.…”
Section: Even Harmonicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the trajectories were in the south-to-north direction. Barr et al, 1985Barr et al, , 1986Rietveld et al, 1989). Also, Getmantsev et al (1974) performed the first ground-based observation of radiation at combination frequencies under HF heating, while Kotik and Trakhtengerts (1975) provided a theoretical treatment of this effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%