1997
DOI: 10.1109/58.655628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elevation performance of 1.25D and 1.5D transducer arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Multi-row transducer arrays are used to provide a thin image slice and good contrast resolution over an extended depth of field [6]. There are two implementation strategies: So-called "1.5D arrays" have electronic beamforming in both azimuth and elevation, allowing dynamic control of the elevation aperture and focus.…”
Section: Slice Thickness Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-row transducer arrays are used to provide a thin image slice and good contrast resolution over an extended depth of field [6]. There are two implementation strategies: So-called "1.5D arrays" have electronic beamforming in both azimuth and elevation, allowing dynamic control of the elevation aperture and focus.…”
Section: Slice Thickness Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of the beamformer is to create a narrow and uniform beam with low sidelobes over a depth as long as possible. Among the already proposed imaging methods and techniques are: elevation focusing (1.25D, 1.5D and 1.75D arrays) (Wildes et al, 1997), beam steering, synthetic apertures, 2D and sparse arrays, configurable arrays, parallel beamforming, micro-beamformers, rectilinear scanning, coded excitation, phased subarray processing, phase aberration correction, and others ( The most common complication introduced by these methods is a significant increase in channel count. Generating narrow ultrasonic wave beams in biological media by multielement probes, built as matrices of elementary piezoceramic transducers in a rectangular configuration, can be realised by using transducers having spherical surfaces, ultrasonic lenses, mechanical elements (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are evaluated using onaxis and off-axis beamplots. The −6 dB beamwidth is an indicator of the resolution of the system and the −20dB beamwidth is an indicator of contrast [5]. The −40 dB beamwidth and the grating lobe levels can be used as indicators of the clutter level in the image.…”
Section: Design Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The beam is well focused in elevation at this depth, but diverges at depths away from the focus degrading image quality. Multi-row arrays such as 1.25-D arrays have been proposed to reduce the slice thickness, but elevation focusing remains static [5,6]. 1.5D, 1.75-D and 2-D arrays can produce a thinner slice thickness since dynamic elevation focusing is possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%