1995
DOI: 10.1016/0169-328x(94)00223-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elevation of striatal and accumbal preproenkephalin, preprotachykinin and preprodynorphin mRNA abundance subsequent to N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor blockade with MK-801

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was unexpected that chronic METH exposure could have resulted in such differential responses in Tac1 and Pdyn mRNA levels since both of their promoters contain AP1/CRE sites that bind members of the AP1 family of IEGs (Calin-Jageman et al, 2006; Cole et al, 1995; Messersmith et al, 1994; 1996; 1998). We had predicted that both Tac1 and Pdyn would show similar changes in expression after chronic METH exposure because they are localized in the same striatal neurons (Angulo et al, 1995) and because previous data suggested that they are both induced by METH (Bannon et al, 1987; Wang et al, 1995). Our present findings, although unexpected, thus, point to the possible existence of factors, other than AP1 transcription factors (Bronstein et al, 1996), which might play more essential roles in regulating Pdyn expression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was unexpected that chronic METH exposure could have resulted in such differential responses in Tac1 and Pdyn mRNA levels since both of their promoters contain AP1/CRE sites that bind members of the AP1 family of IEGs (Calin-Jageman et al, 2006; Cole et al, 1995; Messersmith et al, 1994; 1996; 1998). We had predicted that both Tac1 and Pdyn would show similar changes in expression after chronic METH exposure because they are localized in the same striatal neurons (Angulo et al, 1995) and because previous data suggested that they are both induced by METH (Bannon et al, 1987; Wang et al, 1995). Our present findings, although unexpected, thus, point to the possible existence of factors, other than AP1 transcription factors (Bronstein et al, 1996), which might play more essential roles in regulating Pdyn expression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1996). Receptors of the NMDA type have also been shown to be involved in the regulation of neuropeptide and receptor gene expression in the neostriatum (Lannes & Micheletti 1993;Angulo et al . 1995;Beckstead 1995;Laprade & Soghomonian 1995) and immediate‐early gene expression following activation of the cortex (Liste et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several lines of evidence suggest that striatal enkephalin and substance P expression is under the influence of corticostriatal glutamatergic afferents (Uhl et al, 1988;Somers and Beckstead, 1990;Salin and Chesselet, 1992). Based on the observation that systemic MK-801 administration, either acutely or once daily for 7 days, had no effect or increased striatal enkephalin and substance P mRNA levels according to the doses used (0.01-0.5 mg/kg), Angulo et al (1993Angulo et al ( , 1995 suggested that expression of these peptides undergoes tonic glutamate inhibitory influence through NMDA receptors. In this study, we report the opposite effect of chronic systemic treatment with MK-801 administered twice a day for 8 days at 0.2 mgikg.…”
Section: Role Of Nmda Receptors In the Regulation Of Striatal Substanmentioning
confidence: 99%