1974
DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(1974)2<61:ecptsf>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elevation Changes Preceding the San Fernando Earthquake of February 9, 1971

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Strain and rotation fields at the free surface are the integrated response of all fault slip and should show a fairly sudden transition to higher rates near the epicenter prior to an earthquake. Evidence of such anomalous deformation is the epicentral uplift prior to the 1971 ML = 6.4 San Fernando, California, earthquake which had a left lateral thrust mechanism [Castle et al, 1974]. The anomalous uplift rate commenced about 3 years before the earthquake, but data are insufficient to determine the suddenness of onset A simple and efficient algorithm which exploits the intuitive notion that fault displacements should be monotonic in time is used to satisfy the nonlinear friction law at the fault.…”
Section: Model Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Strain and rotation fields at the free surface are the integrated response of all fault slip and should show a fairly sudden transition to higher rates near the epicenter prior to an earthquake. Evidence of such anomalous deformation is the epicentral uplift prior to the 1971 ML = 6.4 San Fernando, California, earthquake which had a left lateral thrust mechanism [Castle et al, 1974]. The anomalous uplift rate commenced about 3 years before the earthquake, but data are insufficient to determine the suddenness of onset A simple and efficient algorithm which exploits the intuitive notion that fault displacements should be monotonic in time is used to satisfy the nonlinear friction law at the fault.…”
Section: Model Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reid said nothing about precursory fault slip, having no reason to, yet some evidence exists for such motion prior to stick slip events in the laboratory [Scholz et al, 1972;Byedee and Summers, 1975] and in earthquakes, as inferred from study of geodetic data [Castle et al, 1974;Thatcher, 1976] and ground breakage [Allen and Smith, 1966]. Little is known about the relation between precursory fault slip and fault stress, however.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interpretation of vertical geodetic measurements has re-ceived considerable attention in the literature in relation to tectonic changes that occur in the crust both in the zone of earthquake preparation and in the zone of the earthquake and associated aftershocks [e.g., Tsubokawa et al, 1964;Whitcomb et al, 1973;Scholz et al, 1973;Castle et al, 1974;Nur, 1974;Kisslinger, 1975;Stuart and Johnston, 1975;Oliveret al, 1975]. Most of these studies have not estimated the model dependence of their interpretations of leveling, tilt, and gravity changes.…”
Section: So Far Two Classes Of Measurements Have Been Discussedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the approximate horizontal dimension of the anomalous zone and M is the earthquake magnitude. For an M = 6.4 earthquake like the 1971 San Fernando, California, event, L is 133 km, giving an a of 66 km Castle et al [1974]. have interpreted leveling data obtained prior to the San Fernando earthquake and have found a change in d of at least l0 cm near the epicentral area in the 10 years prior to the earthquake.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The vast store of leveling and triangulation data gathered over many decades by public agencies and bureaus is proving to be a virtual gold mine of useful information (Castle et al 1974). An example is the dramatic discovery of southern California's "Palmdale Bulge" (Castle et al 1976), perhaps too hastily christened, as additional investigations (Bennett 1977, Castle et a11977) show it to be an elongated ridge extending from Point Arguello on the coast at least 580 km eastward to the Arizona border with the point of greatest uplift, 45 cm, between TwentyNine Palms and Amboy, a considerable distance east of Palmdale.…”
Section: Geodesy and Recent Deformationmentioning
confidence: 99%