2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elevated tumor-to-liver standardized uptake value ratio (TLR) from preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT predicts poor prognosis of patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies reported low accuracy for FDG-PET in RCC but indicated semiquantitative PET parameters to be associated with survival. [3][4][5][6] We found an association between PET avidity and histologic grading, which suggested that PET positivity was associated with more aggressive disease and poor prognosis. Our study indicated that PET metabolism informs on prognosis in RCC, which renders PET imaging a putative marker to guide treatment decisions in RCC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Previous studies reported low accuracy for FDG-PET in RCC but indicated semiquantitative PET parameters to be associated with survival. [3][4][5][6] We found an association between PET avidity and histologic grading, which suggested that PET positivity was associated with more aggressive disease and poor prognosis. Our study indicated that PET metabolism informs on prognosis in RCC, which renders PET imaging a putative marker to guide treatment decisions in RCC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Unlike in HCCs, the predictive or prognostic value of variable 18 F-FDG uptake remains to be elucidated in RCCs. In a recent report, patients with clear cell RCCs with a preoperatively elevated tumour to liver SUV ratio (TLR) on 18 F-FDG PET/CT had significantly unfavourable survival outcomes after nephrectomy 17 . Of SUV max and TLR on 18 F-FDG PET/CT, primary tumour size, pTNM stage, WHO/ISUP grade, venous tumour thrombus, and adjuvant therapy, pTNM stage and TLR were independent prognostic predictors for disease-free survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, current NCCN clinical practice guidelines do not recommend FDG PET/CT alone to diagnose RCCs or follow-up for evidence of recurrence after surgery 1 . Nevertheless, several previous studies have reported the usefulness of 18 F-FDG uptake in RCCs for predicting aggressive tumour features such as high International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade, distant metastases, and poor patient survival 11 , 13 17 . From a practical point of view, primary tumour detection may be beyond the scope of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in RCCs; however, it could assist with the biological characterisation of RCCs based on the metabolic reprogramming found in individual RCCs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion criteria were as follows [ 15 17 ]: (1) newly diagnosed RCC by primary tumor pathological analyses, (2) radical nephrectomy or combined with tumor thrombectomy (for patients with VTT) performed at our hospital, and (3) 18 F-FDG PET/CT performed before operation and systematic treatment initiation. The additional inclusion criterion for prognosis analysis was available follow-up data for more than 6 months after operation for the patients without disease progression.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As depicted previously [ 17 ], follow-up surveillance after surgery included abdomen ultrasonography or abdomen CT, chest X-ray, and laboratory data, which were regularly collected every 3 months for the first 2 years, then every 6 months until the fifth year, and annually afterward. Disease-free survival (DFS) was defined as the date from operation to recurrence and/or metastasis proven by radiology or pathology, death of any cause, or censored at the last follow-up [ 17 ]. Recurrence was defined as locoregional recurrence or progression of the initial distant metastases according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) guideline (version 1.1) [ 16 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%