2019
DOI: 10.1111/trf.15133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elevated risk for iron depletion in high‐school age blood donors

Abstract: BACKGROUND High school students 16 to 18 years‐old contribute 10% of the US blood supply. Mitigating iron depletion in these donors is important because they continue to undergo physical and neurocognitive development. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS Study objectives were to determine the prevalence of iron depletion in 16‐ to 18‐year‐old donors and whether their risk for iron depletion was greater than adult donors. Successful, age‐eligible donors were enrolled from high school blood drives at two large US blood cen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
46
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(45 reference statements)
2
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In part because over half of plasma donors are aged 18‐34 years, some concerns have been reported that younger donors are donating plasma rather than blood because of financial compensation with plasma donation . Additionally, evidence indicates that adolescent (aged ≤18 years) donors face a greater risk of iron depletion and vasovagal reactions than adult donors . Blood collection facilities might potentially be recruiting fewer adolescent donors as a result of these concerns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In part because over half of plasma donors are aged 18‐34 years, some concerns have been reported that younger donors are donating plasma rather than blood because of financial compensation with plasma donation . Additionally, evidence indicates that adolescent (aged ≤18 years) donors face a greater risk of iron depletion and vasovagal reactions than adult donors . Blood collection facilities might potentially be recruiting fewer adolescent donors as a result of these concerns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Numerous cross-sectional and longitudinal studies have shown that younger age, female sex, and increased frequency of blood donation are factors associated with lower SF levels in blood donor populations. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] In the Recipient Epidemiology and Donor Evaluation Study (REDS)-II Donor Iron Status Evaluation (RISE) study of adult blood donors from six US blood collection centers, there was a significant association between female sex and iron deficiency, with nearly 1 in 5 female adult blood donors having absent iron stores at the time of enrollment (i.e., prior to blood donation). 24 More recently, the Comparison of the History of Donation and Iron Levels in Teen Blood Donors (CHILL) study of adolescent and adult blood donors from two US blood collection centers confirmed that iron deficiency is more common in adolescent as compared to adult donors.…”
Section: Study Design and Methods: A Cross-sectionalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 More recently, the Comparison of the History of Donation and Iron Levels in Teen Blood Donors (CHILL) study of adolescent and adult blood donors from two US blood collection centers confirmed that iron deficiency is more common in adolescent as compared to adult donors. 26 The prevalence of iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia in US blood donors, however, has not been well characterized using nationally representative data. 18 In addition, there are limited populationbased studies comparing the prevalence of iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia between blood donor and nondonor populations.…”
Section: Study Design and Methods: A Cross-sectionalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Convincing evidence of damaging intellectual sequelae due to storage iron deficiency was also disputed by the AABB Donor Iron Deficiency Assessment Working Group. In their report, risk for cognitive performance in adolescents, as well as risk for ongoing brain development, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and fetal development, was described as “theoretical.” A similarly judicious assessment appears in the current paper by Spencer and coworkers concerning the risk for iron depletion in high school blood donors, which notes that any clinical impact “may be subtle and challenging to detect.”…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%