1989
DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90584-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elevated recombination rates in transcriptionally active DNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
793
3
4

Year Published

1996
1996
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,578 publications
(825 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
15
793
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…An effect of transcription on genetic stability in a eukaryotic system was first observed using a segment of the RNA polymerase I transcribed ribosomal DNA locus -denoted HOT1 -that functioned as a cis-acting enhancer of recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae [2]. A similar increase in mitotic recombination and an additional elevation of spontaneous mutation rates in yeast has been associated with high levels of transcription carried out by RNA polymerase II [3][4][5][6][7]. The effect of such transcription-associated mutagenesis (TAM) and recombination (TAR) would be expected to be generally deleterious (e.g., the loss of a tumor suppressor), but may also be advantageous, promoting processes such as in immunoglobulin somatic hypermutation [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An effect of transcription on genetic stability in a eukaryotic system was first observed using a segment of the RNA polymerase I transcribed ribosomal DNA locus -denoted HOT1 -that functioned as a cis-acting enhancer of recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae [2]. A similar increase in mitotic recombination and an additional elevation of spontaneous mutation rates in yeast has been associated with high levels of transcription carried out by RNA polymerase II [3][4][5][6][7]. The effect of such transcription-associated mutagenesis (TAM) and recombination (TAR) would be expected to be generally deleterious (e.g., the loss of a tumor suppressor), but may also be advantageous, promoting processes such as in immunoglobulin somatic hypermutation [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yeast C. versatilis NBR10650 (wild-type), S. cerevisiae YSH642 (Ansell et al, 1997), and W303-1A (Thomas and Rothstein, 1989;Wallis et al, 1989) were cultivated with shaking in YPAD medium (Watanabe et al, 2005) or Leu-dropout medium (Watanabe et al, 2006) after pre-cultivation for 3 days at 30 • C. To induce gene transcription, after precultivation in Leu-dropout medium containing 2% raffinose, pre-culture was added to Leu-dropout medium containing 1% raffinose and 1% galactose and cultivated with shaking at 30 • C. Escherichia coli JM109 (competent cells were purchased from Takara) was cultivated with shaking in LB medium (Sambrook and Russel, 2001) at 37 • C. Culture plates were prepared by solidifying liquid medium through the addition of 2% w/v agar and were incubated at 30 • C or 37 • C.…”
Section: Strains and Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following yeast strains were used: Zygosaccharomyces rouxii NRRL 2547 (obtained from C. Kurtzman), Saccharomyces cerevisiae W303-1A (MATα leu2-3/112 ura3-1 trp1-1 his3-11/15 ade2-1 can1-100 GAL SUC 2 mal 0; Thomas and Rothstein, 1989) and S. cerevisiae yJN009-1D (W303-1A dak1 :: KAN-MX4 dak2 :: HIS3-MX6; Molin M, Norbeck J, Blomberg A, J. Biol. Chem.…”
Section: Microorganisms Plasmids and Culture Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%