2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2011.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elevated radioxenon detected remotely following the Fukushima nuclear accident

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
66
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
66
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The first fission products arrived between 17-18 March about 7 days after the earthquake and in agreement with other reported detections of radionuclides in the western United States (RadNet, 2011;Taylor, 2011;Norman et al, 2011;Bowyer et al, 2011). Our models of the transport of air masses across the Pacific point to a typical transport time of 5 to 6 days.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The first fission products arrived between 17-18 March about 7 days after the earthquake and in agreement with other reported detections of radionuclides in the western United States (RadNet, 2011;Taylor, 2011;Norman et al, 2011;Bowyer et al, 2011). Our models of the transport of air masses across the Pacific point to a typical transport time of 5 to 6 days.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Once the vapors and particles were lifted up to the free troposphere, they could be transported easily by the Westerlies. As mentioned earlier, it took only 4 days for Fukushima-derived radioxenon to travel across the Pacific Ocean (Bowyer et al, 2011) The time series at PCY, NK and DS (Figs. 3(a), 3(b) and 3(c), respectively) show a consistent pattern of waxing and waning in nuclide activities with a progressive lapse in time with respect to the distance travelled from the source region.…”
Section: The First Arrival Time Of Fukushima-derived Fission Nuclidesmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…It took only 4 days for the gaseous 133 Xe (T 1/2 = 5.2 d) to be transported from the emission point in Fukushima Japan (37°25′17′′N, 141°1′57′′E) across the Pacific Ocean, and be detected on March 16 at the Pacific Northwest Laboratory in Richland, Washington, U.S.A. (46°16′47′′N, 119°16′53′′W) (Bowyer et al, 2011). In the ensuing days, 131 I (T 1/2 = 8.02 d), 134 Cs (T 1/2 = 2.06 y) and 137 Cs (T 1/2 = 30.1 y) emitted from Fukushima NPP were detected across the contiguous United States, progressively from the western seaboard to the eastern seaboard (http://www.epa.gov/jap an2011/).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical simulation showed that the radionuclides derived from FNPP1 circulated around the Northern Hemisphere (Stohl et al, 2012), and the fission products were actually detected in aerosol, gaseous, rain and snow samples collected in North America (e.g., Bowyer et al, 2011;Leon et al, 2011), Europe (e.g., Bossew et al, 2012;Masson et al, 2011), central Russia (Bolsunovsky & Dementyev, 2011;Melgunov et al, 2012) and Taiwan (Huh et al, 2012). The radionuclides emitted from FNPP1 were also detected from terrestrial biota not only in Japan (e.g., Hashimoto et al, 2012;Higaki et al, 2012;Tagami et al, 2012) but also in North America (Thakur et al, 2012) and Europe Pittauerova et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%