Dear Editor,We read with interest the study done by Wong et al. [1] in which the authors analyzed circulating maternal platelet microparticles (PMPs) and trophoblast microparticles (MP) during pregnancy to investigate whether pregnancy, labor, or delivery is associated with changes in maternal MPs with regards to origin and composition. The authors found that the percentage PMPs in laboring healthy women was 8.5 % in the third trimester before delivery and 20.5 % after delivery. The %PMPs in nonpregnant healthy controls was also to be 18 % similar to the percentage post-delivery. However, they concluded that labor and delivery are associated with an increase in platelet activation and thus the increase in %PMPs.We analyzed the %PMPs out of the total AnnexinV binding MPs by flow cytometry in 25 healthy pregnant women with one live child and no history of major illness [2]. The method for MP analysis (standardized by participating in the International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis workshop) was carried out as described earlier [3]. The PMP levels were found to be 305, 315, and 552 MP/μl plasma in the first, second, and third trimester and 732 MP/μl post-delivery and the total AnnexinV binding MPs were found to be 1473, 1866, and 2756 MP/μl plasma in the first, second, and third trimester and 1895 MP/μl post-delivery. Thus, the mean %PMPs was found to be 20.7, 17, and 20 % in the first, second, and third trimester and 32 % postdelivery.Thus, if we analyze the data from another angle focusing on the %PMPs instead of the actual levels, is it possible that rather than an increase in platelet activation and %PMPs during labor and delivery, it is actually a decrease of %PMPs during pregnancy which normalizes post-delivery? One possible reason for the decrease during pregnancy is their consumption in fibrin clots which occurs at the placental beds, thus trapping the MPs and thus their removal from circulation.There is evidence of fibrin deposits in placental vasculature in women with bad obstetric history, and PMPs have been shown to adhere to fibrin. Few studies also suggest the consumption of PMPs in fibrin deposits [4,5]. Pregnancy itself is a hypercoagulable state [6], and this condition along with the fact that PMPs apart from being thrombogenic also have the antigen profile of platelets which bind to many factors, may be promoting this consumption of PMPs.The authors have given only %PMPs but have not mentioned the absolute total and platelet MP counts despite of mentioning that MP were measured by adding AccuCount TM fluorescent beads. Also, they have detected platelets under light microscopy only after freeze-thawing. This should have been done prior to freezing as platelets may lyse in the freeze thaw cycle and produce more MPs; distorting the results. Information regarding the platelet counts at different points of sampling would have been useful for their association with the PMPs. With the above information, a clearer idea with respect to the PMP levels during pregnancy would have been established.