2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.07.354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elevated prevalence of 35-44 FMR1 trinucleotide repeats in women with diminished ovarian reserve

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participant characteristics were compared by 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) across race–ethnic groups for continuous variables and by χ 2 tests for categorical variables. Discrete categories for CGG repeat length were selected a priori to respond to prior reports of high normal 4,5 and low normal 7 repeats potentially being associated with early ovarian aging. The categorical distributions of CGG repeat lengths were compared across race–ethnic groups using a Fisher exact test with α = .05.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Participant characteristics were compared by 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) across race–ethnic groups for continuous variables and by χ 2 tests for categorical variables. Discrete categories for CGG repeat length were selected a priori to respond to prior reports of high normal 4,5 and low normal 7 repeats potentially being associated with early ovarian aging. The categorical distributions of CGG repeat lengths were compared across race–ethnic groups using a Fisher exact test with α = .05.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women with premutation level repeats in this gene (55-199 CGG) are at increased risk of premature ovarian failure, [1][2][3] alternatively termed primary ovarian insufficiency. Some reports have suggested that women with 35 to 44 CGGs, 4,5 35 to 54 CGGs, 6 and <28 CGG repeat lengths 7 may be associated with less severe ovarian dysfunction, often manifest as diminished ovarian reserve. These findings are less consistent, as reviewed by Pastore and Johnson.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six studies, representing 975 patients and 1749 controls, were eligible for evaluation of the premutation and intermediate alleles in DOR [15,[18][19][20]30,33]. The prevalence of premutation varied from 1.3 to 15.95% among cases and from 0.0 to 0.6% among controls, while the prevalence of intermediate varied from 1.6 to 13.3% among DOR, and from Notes: NA: data not available; -: data didn't mention in the studies; a: small sample size didn't include in meta-analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The criteria for exclusion were: known cause of elevated FSH for one's age unrelated to fragile X (e.g., surgical removal of either one or both ovaries, chemotherapy or radiation therapy, Turners Syndrome, autoimmune disease), or a family history of FXS or premutation. Knowing that FSH values can vary by assay (Scriver et al 2010;Taieb et al 2002), deidentified samples were run at each satellite site and the primary site (University of Virginia), and adjusted accordingly to ensure consistency in the enrollment criteria across sites as described previously (Pastore et al 2012;Scriver et al 2010).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the mother has approximately 100 CGG repeats in the FMR1 gene, there is a nearly 100 % chance that her child(ren) will have the full mutation (Nolin et al 2003(Nolin et al , 2011, although this risk is moderated when the FMR1 CGG repeat is interspersed with one or more AGG's (Nolin et al 2013). Research since the 1990's has provided evidence that women with a premutation allele (Karimov et al 2011;Sherman 2000), and potentially women with a high normal (Pastore et al 2012;Streuli et al 2009) or gray zone (Gleicher et al 2009;Karimov et al 2011) level repeat (35-44 and 45-54 CGG repeats, respectively), have an increased risk of primary ovarian insufficiency (specifically, a diagnosis of premature ovarian failure and/or DOR). Thus, there is reproductive relevance to women from being tested for the FMR1 premutation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%