2020
DOI: 10.1093/mmy/myaa005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elevated minimum inhibitory concentrations to antifungal drugs prevail in 14 rare species of candidemia-causing Saccharomycotina yeasts

Abstract: Antifungal susceptibility profiles of rare Saccharomycotina yeasts remain missing, even though an increase in prevalence of such rare Candida species was reported in candidemia. Majority of these rare yeast species carry intrinsic resistances against at least one antifungal compound. Some species are known to be cross-resistant (against multiple drugs of the same drug class) or even multi-drug resistant (against multiple drugs of different drug classes). We performed antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) ac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among other yeast species, L. elongisporus and C. fabianii isolates were susceptible to all four antifungal drugs, while R. minuta and M. capitatus isolates showed non-susceptibility to fluconazole and caspofungin. These data are also consistent with recent observations showing that rare Candida /yeast species exhibit non-susceptibility to antifungal drugs, including echinocandins [ 78 , 79 , 80 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Among other yeast species, L. elongisporus and C. fabianii isolates were susceptible to all four antifungal drugs, while R. minuta and M. capitatus isolates showed non-susceptibility to fluconazole and caspofungin. These data are also consistent with recent observations showing that rare Candida /yeast species exhibit non-susceptibility to antifungal drugs, including echinocandins [ 78 , 79 , 80 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…MIC ≤0.06 mg/L separated wild-type from non-wild-type isolates of C. dubliniensis and included the wild-type populations of C. inconspicua, C. norvegensis (Pichia norvegensis), C. pelliculosa (Wickerhamomyces anomala), C. nivariensis, P. kluyveri and L. elongisporus. The modal MICs against C. intermedia, C. palmioleophila, C. kefyr and C. lusitaniae, which have been shown to respond to candin therapy unless having acquired an FKS mutation [56][57][58], were approximately one two-fold dilution higher, suggesting a tentative threshold for suspicion of resistance of >0.125 mg/L for these species [39,45]. When possible, FKS sequencing is, however, recommended for isolates for which repeated MICs are greater than or equal to 0.06 mg/L as this will enable detecting mutations around the likely ECOFF (Table 5).…”
Section: Anidulafunginmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we recommend comparing the MICs to existing MIC distributions for that drug and species to determine if the MIC is most likely "normal" or "elevated" (indicating possible acquired resistance). In Tables 4-7, we summarised our data for more than 4000 isolates and documented alignment to published EUCAST data [25,[34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] (for details on this data, see Supplementary Text S2). These tables can be used for comparison if the local susceptibility testing is confirmed to align with EUCAST testing.…”
Section: General Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations