2009
DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.032722-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elevated levels of σ S inhibit biofilm formation in Escherichia coli: a role for the Rcs phosphorelay

Abstract: The Rcs phosphorelay is composed of RcsC, RcsD and the response regulator RcsB, and this signalling pathway has been implicated in virulence and biofilm formation in many enteric bacteria. It was previously shown that a mutation in rcsC resulted in defective biofilm formation in Escherichia coli [Ferrières, L. & Clarke, D. J. (2003) Mol Microbiol 50, 1665–1682]. To identify the molecular mechanisms underlying the observed biofilm defect we carried out a screen looking for suppressor mutants that restored biof… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(58 reference statements)
5
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The RcsB phosphorylation shift mediated by the dual kinase/ phosphatase activity of RcsC was also proposed previously to be a key feature of the regulation of biofilm formation in E. coli (12). However, the Rcs-dependent regulation of biofilm development in E. coli differs from that of S. Typhimurium, as the mutation of RcsB alone in E. coli has no effect on biofilm formation, while null and point mutations that impede RcsC activity result in a negative phenotype.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The RcsB phosphorylation shift mediated by the dual kinase/ phosphatase activity of RcsC was also proposed previously to be a key feature of the regulation of biofilm formation in E. coli (12). However, the Rcs-dependent regulation of biofilm development in E. coli differs from that of S. Typhimurium, as the mutation of RcsB alone in E. coli has no effect on biofilm formation, while null and point mutations that impede RcsC activity result in a negative phenotype.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…This situation seems to be exactly the opposite of that found for Salmonella. One possible explanation for this is that the inactivation of rcsC might result in the accumulation of phosphorylated RcsB in E. coli (12), whereas the same mutation might result in the accumulation of unphosphorylated RcsB in S. Typhimurium. We can envision at least two different mechanisms that could lead to this different outcome: first, the phosphatase activity of RcsC could prevail over the kinase activity in E. coli, while the opposite balance would take place in S. Typhimurium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A, compare lane 10 to lane 6 and lane 15 to lane 11). This is consistent with work suggesting that RpoS can repress biofilm formation in cells assayed in LB media (Ferrieres et al ., ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, the genes in the Rcs regulon and the observation that the system is induced by solid surfaces suggest that the Rcs phosphorelay may be important during the development of biofilms, when motility needs to be shut down and capsule accumulates. RpoS is needed for biofilm maturation, and too much or too little RpoS interferes with biofilm development (40). It is attractive to suggest that RprA activation of rpoS translation helps to ensure properly timed expression of RpoS during biofilm maturation.…”
Section: Specific Stresses and The Role Of Srnasmentioning
confidence: 99%