“…They classified 83% of t(9;11) AML patients into the M5 subtype (FAB) and found that the median CR duration and median survival of t(9;11) AML patients who had been treated with a standard cytarabine and daunorubicin induction regimen were significantly better than those of AML patients with 11q23 translocations ( P = 0.02 or P = 0.009, resp.). They also found that the percentage organ involvement in adult de novo AML patients with the t(9;11) translocation was as follows: involvement of the skin, 4%; gum hypertrophy, 21%; splenomegaly, 8%; hepatomegaly, 21%; lymphadenopathy, 17%, but no significant difference was seen compared with 11q23 translocation associated AML [30], suggesting that adult patients with MLL leukemia tend to suffer from extramedullary or extranodal lesions; that is, display gingival or skin infiltration, in which cancer infiltration has the potential to activate TF, resulting in DIC [25]. Therefore, strict control of initial DIC or chemotherapy-induced DIC during induction therapy would bring about a better prognosis in patients with 11q23/ MLL AML.…”