Abstract:Integrated pest control on chrysanthemum is now a possibility. Verticillium lecanii (Zimm.) Viegas is one of the key components as, under the right conditions, it will provide good control of pests such as aphids, thrips and whitefly. High humidity for a number of nights per week is critical for reliable pest control with this fungal pathogen. These conditions can be easily and safely obtained by fogging water over the crop at night. Four consecutive nights of high humidity per week or a cycle of two nights of… Show more
“…These factors may also be the reason that both the fungus and the nematode failed once in field 1 of this study. Such failure may be attributed to the comparatively small amount of rainfall in 2006, which may have negatively influenced the fungus (Milner and Lutton 1986;Helyer et al 1992) and the nematode (Ellsbury et al 1996;Portillo-Aguilar et al 1999). However, on average across fields and years, the nematode achieved about 60% efficacy at reducing D. v. virgifera emergence, which is comparable to studies with this nematode in the USA and to the efficacy of insecticides (Jackson 1996;Andersch and Schwarz 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Occasional failures of fungi or nematodes are usually explained by the use of species or strains that are not adapted to the host or to local conditions (Jackson 1995;Shapiro-Ilan et al 2002), by soil aridity and soil texture (Ellsbury et al 1996;Kessler et al 2003;Koppenhöfer and Fuzy 2006) or by the lack of alternative hosts (Brust 1991;Susurluk 2005). Moreover, fungi and nematodes often require high soil moisture (Milner and Lutton 1986;Helyer et al 1992;Fargues and Luz 1998;Butt 2002;Jaronski 2008) and are sensitive to UV radiation (Ferron 1978;Burges 1981;Butt 2002). Occasional failures of soil insecticides, if not caused by resistances, are usually explained by the adsorption of insecticides to organic soil particles (Felsot and Lew 1989), chemical volatilisation and degradation at high soil temperatures (Getzin and Shanks 1970), surface runoff or leaching during heavy rainfalls (Gorder et al 1982) or biodegradation (Felsot et al 1982;Harris et al 1988;Felsot and Lew 1989).…”
All three larval instars of Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte (western corn rootworm, Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) feed on the roots of maize, Zea mays (L.). We assessed the efficacies of the following four agents in controlling these larvae: (1) the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae (Metsch.) Sorokin (Hypocreales: Clavicipitaceae), (2) the nematode Heterorhabditis bacteriophora Poinar (Nematoda: Rhabditida), (3) a tefluthrin-based soil insecticide and (4) clothianidin-coated seeds. The agents were applied in field plot experiments in southern Hungary in 2006 and 2007. Efficacy was assessed by comparing the number of emerging D. v. virgifera adults and corresponding root damage among treatments and untreated controls. All agents significantly reduced D. v. virgifera numbers and root damage, but the relative success of each treatment was variable. On average across fields and years, the nematode and the two insecticides reduced D. v. virgifera by 65 ± 34% SD, while the fungus reduced D. v. virgifera by 31 ± 7%. According to the node injury scale, the agents prevented 23-95% of potential root damage. Large-scale commercialisation of these biological agents could offer viable and practical control options against D. v. virgifera.
“…These factors may also be the reason that both the fungus and the nematode failed once in field 1 of this study. Such failure may be attributed to the comparatively small amount of rainfall in 2006, which may have negatively influenced the fungus (Milner and Lutton 1986;Helyer et al 1992) and the nematode (Ellsbury et al 1996;Portillo-Aguilar et al 1999). However, on average across fields and years, the nematode achieved about 60% efficacy at reducing D. v. virgifera emergence, which is comparable to studies with this nematode in the USA and to the efficacy of insecticides (Jackson 1996;Andersch and Schwarz 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Occasional failures of fungi or nematodes are usually explained by the use of species or strains that are not adapted to the host or to local conditions (Jackson 1995;Shapiro-Ilan et al 2002), by soil aridity and soil texture (Ellsbury et al 1996;Kessler et al 2003;Koppenhöfer and Fuzy 2006) or by the lack of alternative hosts (Brust 1991;Susurluk 2005). Moreover, fungi and nematodes often require high soil moisture (Milner and Lutton 1986;Helyer et al 1992;Fargues and Luz 1998;Butt 2002;Jaronski 2008) and are sensitive to UV radiation (Ferron 1978;Burges 1981;Butt 2002). Occasional failures of soil insecticides, if not caused by resistances, are usually explained by the adsorption of insecticides to organic soil particles (Felsot and Lew 1989), chemical volatilisation and degradation at high soil temperatures (Getzin and Shanks 1970), surface runoff or leaching during heavy rainfalls (Gorder et al 1982) or biodegradation (Felsot et al 1982;Harris et al 1988;Felsot and Lew 1989).…”
All three larval instars of Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte (western corn rootworm, Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) feed on the roots of maize, Zea mays (L.). We assessed the efficacies of the following four agents in controlling these larvae: (1) the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae (Metsch.) Sorokin (Hypocreales: Clavicipitaceae), (2) the nematode Heterorhabditis bacteriophora Poinar (Nematoda: Rhabditida), (3) a tefluthrin-based soil insecticide and (4) clothianidin-coated seeds. The agents were applied in field plot experiments in southern Hungary in 2006 and 2007. Efficacy was assessed by comparing the number of emerging D. v. virgifera adults and corresponding root damage among treatments and untreated controls. All agents significantly reduced D. v. virgifera numbers and root damage, but the relative success of each treatment was variable. On average across fields and years, the nematode and the two insecticides reduced D. v. virgifera by 65 ± 34% SD, while the fungus reduced D. v. virgifera by 31 ± 7%. According to the node injury scale, the agents prevented 23-95% of potential root damage. Large-scale commercialisation of these biological agents could offer viable and practical control options against D. v. virgifera.
“…For example, modern thermal screens not only raised temperature but also humidity (N. L. Helyer and G. A. Gill, Horticulture Research International, personal communication), as did polythene blackouts to alter daylength (Hall and Burges, 1979;Helyer et al, 1992). When nutrient formulations are used this enables the fungus to grow and sporulate on the leaves, as well as increasing sporulation on cadavers, to continually infect invading pests.…”
“…However, numerous factors (slow action, poor ovicidal activity, potentially negative interactions with commonly used fungicides, limited shelf life and dependence on favourable environmental conditions) continue to impede the commercial development and/or application of this fungus 8 . Lecanicillium lecanii requires high humidity for germination, for establishment of infection and for sporulation and consequent epizootics,12–14 which commonly facilitates epizootics of plant disease 15. These factors became bottlenecks in the application of L. lecanii in whitefly control 16 .…”
Crude toxins [toxin(V3450) and toxin(Vp28,) extracted from Lecanicillium (Verticillium) lecanii (Zimmermann) Gams & Zare strain V3450 and Vp28 respectively] were tested for contact toxicity, feeding deterrence and repellent activity against the sweet potato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Both toxins showed ovicidal activity to eggs, with LC(50) values of 447 and 629 mg L(-1) respectively. Nymphs of B. tabaci were the most susceptible stages (LC(50) values were calculated at 111 mg L(-1) for toxin(V3450) and 216 mg L(-1) for toxin(Vp28)), and adults were the second most susceptible stages (48 h LC(50) values were calculated at 178 mg L(-1) for toxin(V3450) and 438 mg L(-1) for toxin(Vp28)). Applied to seedlings at a concentration of 400 mg L(-1), the toxins significantly (P < 0.001) reduced the hatching of whitefly eggs and the subsequent survival rate of the nymphs, and the emergence and fecundity of the progeny adults. Both toxins exhibited repellent activity at low concentration (100 mg L(-1)), with repellency index (RI) values of 0.645 for toxin(V3450) and 0.642 for toxin(Vp28), and antifeedant activity at high concentration (1000 mg L(-1)) to adults, with antifeedant index (AFI) values of 0.713 for toxin(V3450) and 0.749 for toxin(Vp28). The results of the present study demonstrate the toxicity, repellence and antifeedant properties of the fungi metabolite toxins on B. tabaci, which might develop as environmentally friendly plant protectant(s).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.