1938
DOI: 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1938.tb12316.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elements of Water Supply Engineering

Abstract: Every teacher of water supply engineering is always in search of that best single text which may be used simultaneously with lectures and laboratory work. The search then further develops into a contest between comprehensiveness of treatment and size of volume. It is the reviewer's judgment that compromise between these upper and lower millstones is not feasible in the water supply engineering field. The field of water supply engineering now encompasses so many important subjects that the effort to compress th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1954
1954
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ratio method has been described, tested, and applied by many authorities since its early, rudimentary use in the mid-1920's (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6), so that its value has become widely known to population forecasters. Despite this great popularity, however, a review of seven representative texts (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13) in the fields of water supply and sanitary engineering disclosed seven accounts-all enthusiastic-of the long discredited analogy (comparative) method; six, of the equally outmoded geometric method; five, of arithmetic projection; two, of logistic extrapolation; four, of miscellaneous methods; and none, of the ratio method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ratio method has been described, tested, and applied by many authorities since its early, rudimentary use in the mid-1920's (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6), so that its value has become widely known to population forecasters. Despite this great popularity, however, a review of seven representative texts (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13) in the fields of water supply and sanitary engineering disclosed seven accounts-all enthusiastic-of the long discredited analogy (comparative) method; six, of the equally outmoded geometric method; five, of arithmetic projection; two, of logistic extrapolation; four, of miscellaneous methods; and none, of the ratio method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%