Elements of Influenza Vaccination Programs That Predict Higher Vaccination Rates: Results of an Emerging Infections Network Survey

Abstract

Introduction.To address suboptimal influenza vaccination rates among health care workers, the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recently issued recommendations designed to increase the number of health care workers vaccinated against influenza. The purpose of the present study was to determine how widely these recommendations have been implemented and to identify important elements of successful influenza vaccine programs.Methods. The Infectious Diseases Society of America Emerging Infections Network surveyed 991 infectious diseases consultants. Infectious diseases consultants were asked about vaccination programs and vaccination rates at their respective institutions. Multinomial logistic regression models based on proportional odds were used to determine predictors of vaccination-rate categories. All program elements were significant univariable factors in predicting vaccination rates. Because the program elements were highly associated with one another, principal components analysis was used to find combinations of the covariates that would serve as optimal predictors of higher vaccination rates.Results. Most infectious diseases consultants indicated that the vaccination rate for all health care workers in their institution had a range of 41%-60%. Vaccination rates were significantly higher in institutions that required signed declination statements (). In the model based on principal components analysis for predicting P p .004 institutional vaccination rates, only the first principal component warranted retention ( ). In this component, P ! .001 the program elements weighted the most heavily were (1) offering the influenza vaccine free of charge, (2) providing adequate staff and resources, and (3) educating targeted groups of health care workers. Requiring signed declinations was not heavily weighted.Conclusion. Influenza vaccination rates remain suboptimal, and hospitals have not completely implemented the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee-Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendations to maximize vaccination rates.

Revised SHEA Position Paper: Influenza Vaccination of Healthcare Personnel

“…The use of such statements as a part of a comprehensive vaccination program has led to modest increases in coverage in some instances. 51 " 54 The impact of such statements, however, is variable, 55,56 likely affected by the content of the declination (eg, wording that notes risks to patients by refusing vaccination) as well as its context (eg, a requirement for a face-toface meeting to review the reasons for refusal, or an Internetbased tool). 42 Accordingly, use of these statements should not be viewed as the primary method for increasing vaccination rates.…”

A quality improvement project to increase influenza vaccination in healthcare personnel at a university health center

“…According to Polgreen et al (), the requirement for declination form was not predictive of vaccination rates, but it was associated with a higher vaccination rate in institutions that required one. In the current study, though, declination form was rated as the least effective intervention.…”

A Statewide System for Improving Influenza Vaccination Rates in Hospital Employees

“…The reporting period for each vaccination season was October 1 through March 31, and the surveys were collected in May after the reporting period. A third Web-based survey was distributed at the end of season 2 (in June) to assess the implementation of the evidence-based recommendations, designed to increase vaccination rates among HCWs, that were endorsed by the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) and the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) 7,13…”