“…Another underlying assumption in most of the papers is an implicit consensus of what a body is. There are traces of the notion of a Cartesian dualism that sees the body‐object as a physical entity (Draper, 2014 ; Marchetti et al, 2016 ) present in the body care practices as a passive biomedical object divided into bodily parts (skin, mouth, feet, perineal area), which can be handled and be the subject of clinical studies (e.g., Bliss et al, 2011 , 2017 ; Jablonski et al, 2017 ; Kon et al, 2017 ; Matsumoto et al, 2019 ), as well as a body‐subject experiencing either receiving body care (Råholm, 2012 ) or providing body care (D'hondt et al, 2012 ; Holmberg et al, 2020 ). In these papers, the corporeality of the body is not mentioned, whereas the experiencing subject is dominant.…”