2002
DOI: 10.21061/jte.v14i1.a.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elementary School Students' Understandings of Technology Concepts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). Regarding the domain of SMK (A) and its relations (a, b, and d), both general SMK and the concept of technology are reported to be important knowledge aspects for teaching technology (Parkinson 2001;Davis et al 2002;Garmire and Pearson 2006;Jarvis and Rennie 1996a;Cunningham et al 2006). It is generally assumed that SMK is a prerequisite for the development of PCK (Van Driel et al 1998).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…1). Regarding the domain of SMK (A) and its relations (a, b, and d), both general SMK and the concept of technology are reported to be important knowledge aspects for teaching technology (Parkinson 2001;Davis et al 2002;Garmire and Pearson 2006;Jarvis and Rennie 1996a;Cunningham et al 2006). It is generally assumed that SMK is a prerequisite for the development of PCK (Van Driel et al 1998).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the more teacher's SMK is shaped in a scientifically and technologically correct way, the less likely it is that teachers will encourage pupils' development of inappropriate conceptions (Parkinson 2001). In line with this statement, Davis (2002) advocates that all pre-service and in-service primary school teachers should be better informed about the key areas of technology.…”
Section: Subject Matter Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results have been presented in several reports (Bame et al 1993;Garmire et al 2006;Raat and de Vries 1986). These and other empirical studies show that referring to some particular objects (often modern communication equipment) is the most common way of describing technology (Davis et al 2002;de Vries 2005;Jones 1997 Twyford and Järvinenn (2000) studied pupils' understanding of some technological principles, such as balance and torque, by using a model of a bridge and asking questions surrounding that. In this study children's technological concepts were expressed using their previous experiences and fantasies.…”
Section: Objects and Systems As Manifested In Pupils' Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%