2018
DOI: 10.14507/epaa.26.3546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elementary principals’ social construction of parents of color and working class parents: Disrupting or reproducing conflicting and deficit orientations of education policy?

Abstract: School principals, contending with competing characterizations of parents in education policy and society, may view parents in a number of ways. Two common understandings portray parents as authentic partners or, in contrast, simply supporters of the school’s agenda. This paper explores these characterizations by considering the possible link between principals’ understandings of parents and their approaches to parent engagement and/or shared decision making, especially in light of the ways that the social con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(94 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…District policies are the anchors for systemic structural change (Bertrand et al, 2018; Lopez et al, 2001; E. A. Martinez, 1988).…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…District policies are the anchors for systemic structural change (Bertrand et al, 2018; Lopez et al, 2001; E. A. Martinez, 1988).…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When policy makers and educators claim they want to make schools more accessible to parents and/or caregivers, they can sometimes create policies and implement practices that frame parents as "needy" and oblivious (Bertrand et al, 2018). The community schools initiative was intended to support parents, especially those from marginalized groups, to become "more engaged" in schools.…”
Section: Deficit Perspectives Of Parentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social constructions matter for implementation because they influence who benefits or loses from a policy intervention (Bertrand et al, 2018). Schneider and Ingram (1997) posited that when policies target dependent populations, such as underrepresented students, implementers may feel pressure "to ensure 'deserving' have been separated from 'undeserving' and that ineligible persons (e.g., 'non-deserving ones') are not receiving benefits" (p. 138).…”
Section: Social Construction Of Target Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%