2016
DOI: 10.17125/fsu.1508170543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elementary Mathematics Student Assessment: Measuring the Performance of Grade 1 and 2 Students in Counting, Word Problems, and Computation in Fall 2013

Abstract: A great many people were involved with the development, field-testing, data entry, data analysis, and reporting. Here we name some of the key players and briefly describe their roles, starting with the report coauthors. Robert Schoen wrote the test and item specifications, developed items, coordinated the external review, edited and proofed the final forms, and managed the scoring and interpreting of results. Mark LaVenia performed the data analysis for the unidimensional item-response theory models, factor an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second stratum involved splitting the class by baseline test achievement level on the fall 2013 Elementary Mathematics Student Assessment (EMSA; Schoen, LaVenia, Bauduin, & Farina, 2016). Class rosters were divided into four subcategories based on gender and median achievement level: upper boy, lower boy, upper girl, lower girl.…”
Section: Random Selection Of Students For Interview-based Mathematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The second stratum involved splitting the class by baseline test achievement level on the fall 2013 Elementary Mathematics Student Assessment (EMSA; Schoen, LaVenia, Bauduin, & Farina, 2016). Class rosters were divided into four subcategories based on gender and median achievement level: upper boy, lower boy, upper girl, lower girl.…”
Section: Random Selection Of Students For Interview-based Mathematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students with consent to participate completed a written, whole-class-administered mathematics test named the Fall 2013 Elementary Mathematics Student Assessment (EMSA; Schoen, LaVenia, Bauduin, & Farina, 2016) at the beginning of the 2013 14 school year. The purpose of the test was to permit examination of baseline equivalence of the students in treatment and comparison schools and to serve as a covariate in the statistical models estimating impact of the treatment and exploring potential moderators.…”
Section: Fall 2013 Student Baseline Tests: Grades 1 Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The conceptual framework for the tests are informed by theorized learning progressions in the domain of fractions (Empson & Levi, 2011;Kiearan, 1976;Siegler & Lortie-Forgues, 2015;Siegler & Pyke, 2013;Siegler, Thompson, & Schneider, 2011). The selection of items used on the Fall 2015 3-5 EMSA tests was informed by large-scale field tests of previous versions of the EMSA and assessment items adapted from versions provided in published literature (Baturo, 2004;Beckmann, 2005;Bright, Behr, Post, & Wachsmuth, 1988;Hackenberg, Norton, Wilkins, & Steffe, 2009;Lamon, 2005;Larson, 1980;Lewis & Perry, 2017;Massachusetts Department of Education, 2013;Pothier & Sawada, 1983;Saxe, Diakow, & Gearhart, 2013;Saxe, Kirby, Kang, Le, & Schneider, 2015;Schoen, LaVenia, Bauduin, & Farina, 2016a;2016b;Schoen, LaVenia, Champagne, Farina, & Tazaz, 2016;Schoen, Liu, Yang, & Paek, 2017).…”
Section: Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Fall 2015 K-2 EMSA was the result of an iterative process of development and feedback from a variety of experts. This test built on our work in the development and implementation of the fall 2013 and fall 2014 EMSA tests (Schoen, LaVenia, Bauduin, & Farina, 2016a;2016b) and the spring 2014 and spring 2015 Mathematics Performance and Cognition (MPAC) Interviews Schoen, LaVenia, Champagne, Farina, & Tazaz, 2016). The Fall 2015 K-2 EMSA has three major sections: Counting, Word Problems, and Computation.…”
Section: !Introduction and Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%