2021
DOI: 10.1177/0309132520987301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elemental worlds: Specificities, exposures, alchemies

Abstract: The elements have become the focus of a significant volume of research by geographers and others. Engagements with the elements have been framed in terms of four elemental orientations: matter, molecule, milieu and media. Our aim is to consider what is at stake in efforts to think with, across and beyond these orientations. Avoiding any reduction of the elements to a single ontological or epistemological proposition, we explore possibilities for grasping their implication in the composition and decomposition o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a recent article in this journal by Engelmann and McCormack (2021: 1423) observed, diverse elemental scholarship negotiates tensions between the elements as something specific (earth, air, fire, water or chemical elements, for example), and something excessive, something that ‘remains withdrawn from and exceeds’ epistemic habits of technoscientific or conceptual reductionism. As Engelmann and McCormack (2021) and others (e.g. Hawkins 2020) observe, future elemental geographies might do well to look elsewhere other than the Western pre-Socratic thinkers for their understandings of matter and life.…”
Section: Into the Critical Zone 1: Geo – An Aesthetics Of/for The Earth?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a recent article in this journal by Engelmann and McCormack (2021: 1423) observed, diverse elemental scholarship negotiates tensions between the elements as something specific (earth, air, fire, water or chemical elements, for example), and something excessive, something that ‘remains withdrawn from and exceeds’ epistemic habits of technoscientific or conceptual reductionism. As Engelmann and McCormack (2021) and others (e.g. Hawkins 2020) observe, future elemental geographies might do well to look elsewhere other than the Western pre-Socratic thinkers for their understandings of matter and life.…”
Section: Into the Critical Zone 1: Geo – An Aesthetics Of/for The Earth?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second framing understands ‘air rights’ as the right to urban airs (e.g., breathing) and sky (e.g., access to sunlight and landscapes) (Gibson-Graham et al, 2016). Urban airs are key depositories of chemical circulations from densification processes; sources of life support (Engelmann and McCormack, 2021; Graham, 2015); and sites where territorial tensions between urban commons and private enclosures unfold. From breathing to access to sunlight, air rights chart the geospatial trajectories that not only reveal the relationship across airs as biophysical commons; industrial effluvia, and respiratory vulnerabilities but also the relevant monitoring and documentation of such elemental ecologies serve as an actionable agenda of commoning (Zee, 2021).…”
Section: Follow the Air Rightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our approach contributes to an ongoing debate in geography and beyond concerning the phenomenal nature of weather and climate (Barry et al, 2020;Diaconu, 2022;Hitchings, 2022;Horn, 2018;Neimanis and Walker, 2014;Schnegg, 2019;Verlie, 2022) and sensing (Engelmann, 2020;Förster, 2021;Gabrys, 2019;McCormack, 2008;McCormack and Engelmann, 2021). How are weather and climate experienced (differently)?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%