2014
DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2014.998352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elemental mercury oxidation in an electrostatic precipitator enhanced with in situ soft X-ray irradiation

Abstract: Corona discharge based techniques are promising approaches for oxidizing elemental mercury (Hg 0 ) in flue gas from coal combustion. In this study, in-situ soft X-rays were coupled to a DC (direct current) corona-based electrostatic precipitator (ESP). The soft X-rays significantly enhanced Hg 0 oxidation, due to generation of electrons from photoionization of gas molecules and the ESP electrodes. This coupling technique worked better in the positive corona discharge mode because more electrons were in the hig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, for both positive and negative polarity, the current was higher with SXR at low voltages. Interestingly, with voltages higher than 12 kV, the currents were similar regardless of the presence of SXR, which was not reported in previous studies (Hogan, Lee, and Biswas 2004;Jing et al 2015;Kulkarni et al 2002).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, for both positive and negative polarity, the current was higher with SXR at low voltages. Interestingly, with voltages higher than 12 kV, the currents were similar regardless of the presence of SXR, which was not reported in previous studies (Hogan, Lee, and Biswas 2004;Jing et al 2015;Kulkarni et al 2002).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…However, there is no study on applying SXR to capture fine particles in coal-fired power plants. In our work, the capture efficiency of a lab-scale SXR-enhanced ESP, for which the configuration details can be found in Figure S1 in the supplemental information and in previous studies (Jing et al 2015), was tested with the undesiccated wet flue gas. Figure S2 shows the current-voltage (I-V) characteristics of the ESP with SXR.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SXR has more intensity than UV lamps but less intensity than x-ray, and therefore can be utilized safely and can be easily controlled by turning them on and off [13,14]. SXR generates gaseous ions, which have been widely studied for charging aerosol particles and oxidizing environmental pollutants [11,[13][14][15]. Namiki et al were the first to introduce SXR into the V/TiO 2 -ESP system to remove VOCs; they obtained approximately 70% removal efficiency of toluene with high reaction rate (8.07 × 10 −2 μmol h −1 cm −2 ), which was much faster than conventional UV lamp systems [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It takes place in a wide range of processes from gas reactions and particle formation in the atmosphere 34 to particle removal in industrial or household devices. 35 The diffusion charging of particles is commonly realized by introducing particles into an environment that contains radioactive materials, where radiation generates ions that actively collide with the particles. 36 Currently, two theories exist in describing the diffusion charging of spherical particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In diffusion charging, bipolar/unipolar ions freely diffuse to the surface of the particles, where the charges are transferred. It takes place in a wide range of processes from gas reactions and particle formation in the atmosphere to particle removal in industrial or household devices . The diffusion charging of particles is commonly realized by introducing particles into an environment that contains radioactive materials, where radiation generates ions that actively collide with the particles .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%