2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elemental assessment of vegetation via portable X-ray fluorescence (PXRF) spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
35
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
35
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Standard errors of prediction were 2.2, 2.6, and 1.5 mg kg -1 for Zn, Fe, and Se, respectively. Likewise, McGladdery et al (2018), using thatch, deciduous leaves, single species of grasses, tree bark and herbaceous plants, demonstrated that PXRF is a useful approach for elemental determination (Zn, Pb, Cd, and Fe) in vegetation samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Standard errors of prediction were 2.2, 2.6, and 1.5 mg kg -1 for Zn, Fe, and Se, respectively. Likewise, McGladdery et al (2018), using thatch, deciduous leaves, single species of grasses, tree bark and herbaceous plants, demonstrated that PXRF is a useful approach for elemental determination (Zn, Pb, Cd, and Fe) in vegetation samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with this cost, the generation of hazardous waste is a consideration. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) could overcome many of these disadvantages of wet chemical analysis and allows quick determination of elemental concentrations at reduced cost in plant samples (Reidinger et al, 2012; Towett et al, 2016; McGladdery et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the advances that have emerged in recent years and are potentially applicable in improving agricultural management, the portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) spectrometer stands out by detecting contents of chemical elements in a few seconds and without the production of sample waste (Ribeiro et al, 2017;Weindorf;Bakr;Zhu, 2014). PXRF can be used directly in the field or in the laboratory to detect total elemental content of the Periodic Table from Mg to U in soil samples and other materials (McGladdery et al, 2018;Pearson et al, 2017;Ribeiro et al, 2017;Weindorf;Bakr;Zhu, 2014). Some studies have shown good results for predicting soil chemical properties, such as pH (Sharma et al, 2014) and cation exchange capacity (Sharma et al, 2015), but few have attempted to predict available nutrient contents from pXRF analyses (Silva et al, 2017;Pelegrino et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have used pXRF data to predict various soil chemical and physical properties resulted from conventional laboratory analyses (Aldabaa et al, 2015;Sharma et al, 2014;Sharma et al, 2015;Silva et al, 2017;Zhu et al, 2011). This means that, analyses that are costly, difficult to be performed, time-consuming, and that generate chemical residues could be replaced or at least reduced, if accurate predictions of their results are achieved from pXRF data (Rouillon and Taylor, 2016;McGladdery et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%