2011
DOI: 10.1021/nl200242c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Element-Specific Magnetic Hysteresis of Individual 18 nm Fe Nanocubes

Abstract: Correlating the electronic structure and magnetic response with the morphology and crystal structure of the same single ferromagnetic nanoparticle has been up to now an unresolved challenge. Here, we present measurements of the element-specific electronic structure and magnetic response as a function of magnetic field amplitude and orientation for chemically synthesized single Fe nanocubes with 18 nm edge length. Magnetic states and interactions of monomers, dimers, and trimers are analyzed by X-ray photoemiss… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
60
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, the available literature reveals a significant scatter of magnetic properties that cannot be assigned only to particle size or environment. For instance, the magnetic anisotropy energies of Fe nanoparticles are reported to range from bulklike to * Corresponding author: armin.kleibert@psi.ch strongly enhanced values in different experiments [13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Similarly, for Co nanoparticles the experimentally observed values vary over several orders of magnitude [20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instead, the available literature reveals a significant scatter of magnetic properties that cannot be assigned only to particle size or environment. For instance, the magnetic anisotropy energies of Fe nanoparticles are reported to range from bulklike to * Corresponding author: armin.kleibert@psi.ch strongly enhanced values in different experiments [13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Similarly, for Co nanoparticles the experimentally observed values vary over several orders of magnitude [20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, an unambiguous interpretation of the experimental data is difficult, since most of the reported investigations have been carried out with experimental techniques that average over large distributions of particle sizes, morphologies, and orientations. The situation might be complicated further by the presence of interparticle interactions, which can affect ensemble properties such as magnetization curves acquired with bulk SQUID and vibrating sample magnetometry, or integrated x-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) spectroscopy [15,34,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples are magnetic multilayers, where the depthdependence of the magnetization or the spin character at buried interfaces is a very interesting topic to study [43]. Other examples where the 3rd dimension plays an important role are magnetic nanoparticles [44], core-shell structures, such as hard/soft materials for future permanent magnet materials [45], or magnetic supercrystals. The latter ones are arrays of nanocrystals, which self-assemble into superlattices.…”
Section: Adding Depth Resolution To X-ray Microscopiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, while their size distribution may well be controllable, the orientation of the magneto-crystallographic directions for two-dimensional arrays of such spherical nanoparticles pose technical difficulties [3]. To circumvent this problem, new wet-chemical methods were invented allowing to fabricate Fe/Fe x O y -core-shell-magnetic nanoparticles in form of cubes with side lengths ranging from 14 nm [4] or 18 nm [5] to over 40 nm [6]. Forming nano cubes arrays deposited onto a substrate sufficiently reduces the parameter space for characterization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%