2019
DOI: 10.1142/s0219876218501463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Element-Quality-Based Stiffening for the Pseudoelastic Mesh-Moving Technique

Abstract: In this study, element-quality-based stiffening (EQBS) was developed as a method of maintaining mesh quality in the pseudoelastic mesh-moving technique. The proposed EQBS technique increases the stiffness of the element based on two element quality parameters, the element area and shape; this differs from techniques used in previous studies. Importantly, EQBS includes the previously proposed Jacobian-based stiffening (JBS) and minimum height-based stiffening (MHBS) techniques as a specific case. Therefore, it … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the interface tracking methods need sophisticated mesh control methods based on implicit algorithms, of which computational cost might be same with or more expensive than that of CFD and CSD solvers. 27,[63][64][65][66] Furthermore, realistic structural mechanics models that are intended to replicate structural details using finite elements seem to be too expensive computationally to be implemented into strongly coupled FSI simulations. 13 Hence, to our best knowledge, there is no model wing that can reproduce both cambering and feathering passively, of which magnitudes are equivalent to those of actual insects, from large elastic deformations in the FSI simulations.…”
Section: 23mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In general, the interface tracking methods need sophisticated mesh control methods based on implicit algorithms, of which computational cost might be same with or more expensive than that of CFD and CSD solvers. 27,[63][64][65][66] Furthermore, realistic structural mechanics models that are intended to replicate structural details using finite elements seem to be too expensive computationally to be implemented into strongly coupled FSI simulations. 13 Hence, to our best knowledge, there is no model wing that can reproduce both cambering and feathering passively, of which magnitudes are equivalent to those of actual insects, from large elastic deformations in the FSI simulations.…”
Section: 23mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the computational cost for the mesh control tends to be more expensive than those for solving the consistent PPE and equilibrium equations. 65 In this study, for the purpose of eliminating this numerical difficulty, we propose a novel approach that combines a pixel model wing with an explicit mesh control method. The pixel model wing is based on the shape simplification of insect flapping wings, 74 but different from the previous study, it is represented as the structured mesh with pixel modeling of veins using shell finite elements.…”
Section: Proposed Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In these models, the complicated network of the veins is represented using the beam elements, and the wing membrane is represented using the unstructured elements. However, the usage of the unstructured elements might impose a sophisticated mesh-moving technique on controlling the fluid mesh surrounding the wing model [9] in the finite element analysis of the fluid-structure interaction. Hence, for the purpose of computational efficiency, the pixel wing model consisting of a structured mesh using shell elements has been proposed [10].…”
Section: Journal Of Advanced Simulation In Science and Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%