1998
DOI: 10.1109/20.717759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Element-free Galerkin method for electromagnetic field computations

Abstract: Although numerically very efficient the finite element method exhibits difficulties whenever the remeshing of the analysis domain must be performed. For such problems utilizing meshless computation methods is very promising. In this paper, a kind of meshless method called the element-free Galerkin method is introduced for electromagnetic field computation. The mathematical background for the moving least square approximation employed in the method is given, and the numerical implementation is briefly discussed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The weak form functional corresponding to the above boundary value problem is (4) Owing to the non-Kronecker delta function property of the shape functions of meshless methods, an additional term representing contributions of normal derivatives of the solution variable on essential boundaries that corresponds to that for the finite element method, is introduced in the formulations of (4). It should be pointed out that this term is commonly neglected by most fellow researchers in their related works.…”
Section: A Governing Equation and Weak Form Functionalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The weak form functional corresponding to the above boundary value problem is (4) Owing to the non-Kronecker delta function property of the shape functions of meshless methods, an additional term representing contributions of normal derivatives of the solution variable on essential boundaries that corresponds to that for the finite element method, is introduced in the formulations of (4). It should be pointed out that this term is commonly neglected by most fellow researchers in their related works.…”
Section: A Governing Equation and Weak Form Functionalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the unknown parameters , the difference between the local approximation given by (5) and the nodal parameters , i.e., the weighted, discrete norm as given by (6), is minimized. Moreover, (6) where is a compactly supported weighting function with center at node and is the number of nodes in the neighborhood of for which the weighting function [3], [4]. The weighting functions used in this paper are the tensor products of one dimensional ones.…”
Section: B Moving Least Square Approximationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The EFGM has been used to model a variety of physics, e.g. 2D linear elasticity [8][9][10], static and dynamic fracture mechanics [11,12], plate and shell analysis [13][14][15], vibration [7,16,17], electromagnetics [18], heat transfer [8,[19][20][21], metal forming [22,23], biomechanics [24,25] and geomechanics [26]. While the EFGM is superior to the FEM in terms of accuracy and convergence, and there are no issues of volumetric locking [27], MLS shape functions are computationally more expensive and complicate the imposition of essential boundary conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is highly desirable to explore methods which will alleviate, at least partly, the onerous mesh generation or adaptive updating process. Accordingly, many meshless methods, all of which originate from computational mechanics, have been proposed and proved to be very promising in the study of electromagnetic field problems [2]- [5]. Since the interpolation of meshless methods is based on a set of nodes, and a connectivity of elements is not required, they offer the flexibility of additions and deletions of a set of nodes, which may be distributed in the solution domain irregularly, with relative ease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%