2019
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab23f1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Element Abundances: A New Diagnostic for the Solar Wind

Abstract: We examine the different element abundances exhibited by the closed loop solar corona and the slow speed solar wind. Both are subject to the First Ionization Potential (FIP) Effect, the enhancement in coronal abundance of elements with FIP below 10 eV (e.g. Mg, Si, Fe) with respect to high FIP elements (e.g. O, Ne, Ar), but with subtle differences. Intermediate elements, S, P, and C, with FIP just above 10 eV, behave as high FIP elements in closed loops, but are fractionated more like low FIP elements in the s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
106
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
4
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It turns out that the region of high Si/S seems confined to closed magnetic loops and active regions which comparisons of SEP abundances with FIP theory (Fig. 2(a); Reames 2018a; Laming et al 2019) have told us to be the origin of SEPs. This helps to confirm the origin of plasma that will become SEPs.…”
Section: Entering the Corona: The Fip Effectmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…It turns out that the region of high Si/S seems confined to closed magnetic loops and active regions which comparisons of SEP abundances with FIP theory (Fig. 2(a); Reames 2018a; Laming et al 2019) have told us to be the origin of SEPs. This helps to confirm the origin of plasma that will become SEPs.…”
Section: Entering the Corona: The Fip Effectmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…When Bochsler (2007) suggested that the Apollo solar wind foil data on helium and neon, while ambiguous, were consistent with a Coulomb drag model (described in the Discussion), he indirectly acknowledged that sample return was necessary to obtain precision data. Laming et al (2017) presented a quantitative model demonstrating how isotopic and elemental (primarily FIP) fractionation in the SW may be related, driven by magnetohydrodynamic waves whose interactions vary spatially and cause the variations in the SW fractionation and velocity with the solar source region observed by spacecraft (detailed overview in Laming et al 2019). This last solar physics model relies heavily on a baseline SW composition determined from laboratory measurement of SW samples collected and returned to the Earth by the Genesis SW Sample Return mission.…”
Section: Mass Fractionation In the Sw: Previous Work In Solar Physicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() presented a quantitative model demonstrating how isotopic and elemental (primarily FIP) fractionation in the SW may be related, driven by magnetohydrodynamic waves whose interactions vary spatially and cause the variations in the SW fractionation and velocity with the solar source region observed by spacecraft (detailed overview in Laming et al. ). This last solar physics model relies heavily on a baseline SW composition determined from laboratory measurement of SW samples collected and returned to the Earth by the Genesis SW Sample Return mission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not sufficient that the field lines open later to produce the SSW, they must be open when that plasma crosses the chromosphere and enters the corona, since that is when its FIP is, or is not, controlled by resonant Alfvén waves. The difference that we have found between SEPs and the solar wind is as important for understanding the solar wind as for understanding SEPs [13,59,87,88].…”
Section: Comparing Seps With the Solar Windmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…These shocks often form out beyond the orbit of Earth and the accelerated ions show power-law abundance variations in A/Q as they flow inward. CIR measurements [90] provide an additional measurement of the FIP-dependence of the solar wind abundances [59,88] and they are included in Figure 9. [59] with the closed loop model of Laming [87] (Table 3).…”
Section: Comparing Seps With the Solar Windmentioning
confidence: 99%