1976
DOI: 10.1515/zna-1976-0807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elektronentransport in nichtthermischen Edelgasplasmen

Abstract: Transport of Electrons in Non-Thermal Noble Gas PlasmaFor the transport of electrons in a non-thermal, weakly ionized plasma an analytical model and a detailed numerical calculation is presented. The following transport coefficients: mean energy, characteristic energy, mobility, diffusion coefficient, excitation and ionization coefficient for He, Ne, Ar, Kr, Xe are calculated in the region of reduced electric field 0.01 V/cm Torr < Elp < 100 V/cm Torr. The parameters of the model are developed using the existi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
1

Year Published

1976
1976
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(11 reference statements)
1
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculated electron drift velocity is in close agreement with the measurements as well, especially with the more recent ones of Kucukarpaci and Lucas. The agreement with Boltzmann calculations of Engelhardt and Phelps (1964), Lehrke andMuller (1976), andJudd (1976) is excellent. For ease of viewing the results of these authors are not shown in figure 5 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The calculated electron drift velocity is in close agreement with the measurements as well, especially with the more recent ones of Kucukarpaci and Lucas. The agreement with Boltzmann calculations of Engelhardt and Phelps (1964), Lehrke andMuller (1976), andJudd (1976) is excellent. For ease of viewing the results of these authors are not shown in figure 5 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…There is a possibility that the reason for the discrepancies between the values of figure 2 and those by Brooks et a1 (1982) is the time resolution of the detection system they used. The calculated values of W of Lehrke and Muller (1976) and Makabe and Mori (1978) are about 35% smaller than the present calculated results at E/N = 100 Td. These discrepancies are due to their use of unsuitable cross-sections, especially large values of qm for electron energies larger than 5 eV.…”
Section: Drift Velocitycontrasting
confidence: 92%
“…50). The values of d were varied at constant N. The calculated values of DT/p are shown in figure 5 as a solid curve and are compared with values calculated by Frost and Phelps (1964), Pfau and Rutscher (1969) and Lehrke and Muller (1976). There are no experimental measurements of this parameter for comparison with present calculations.…”
Section: Ratio Of Transverse Diffusion Coeficient To Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations