1923
DOI: 10.1002/andp.19233772204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elektrizitätsdurchgang durch Kristalle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
5

Year Published

1923
1923
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The causes usually considered for an absorption current are dipole orientation and ionic conduction 20–23. In our experiments, the main cause is ionic conduction attributed to ionic impurities contained in the film.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The causes usually considered for an absorption current are dipole orientation and ionic conduction 20–23. In our experiments, the main cause is ionic conduction attributed to ionic impurities contained in the film.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In general, the ionic conduction can change the space charge distribution in a dielectric film,20, 22, 23 that is, ionic polarization and irreversible electrochemical reactions of the ionic impurities are possible causes of the change in the distribution. In our experiment, the electric‐field application at an interval of 1 day caused an absorption current that was almost the same as was the current observed during the first application.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fließdruckkurve für Steinsalz von Joffe 1. verglichen mit der neu aufgenommenen Fließdruckkurvc II.für die Festigkeit des Steinsalzes beim absoluten Nullpunkte (s. Zwicky(47)) (s.Fig. 5).Zu ähnlichen Ergebnissen wie den hier bestimmten Fließdruckwerten für Steinsalz gelangte Joff6(14). Die Abweichungen der Fließkurve Joff6s und der neu aufgenommenen unterhalb 180° sind aus den wenigen und mit großen Fehlern behafteten Versuchen Joffis zu erklären, da Joff6 nur durch einen Kunstgriff die Plastizität unterhalb 200° bestimmen konnte(Fig.…”
unclassified
“…If 0 is in ohans, this formula must bo multiplied by 10"^. Curie (1889, p. 385)"'"' measured tho specific ''"see Landolt-Bornsteln Tabcllen II, 1062(1923. resistance of calclte, and his values and the values of D calculated from them are given in Table 3.…”
Section: 972mentioning
confidence: 99%