1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf01555523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electroweak radiative corrections toe + e ??HZ

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
118
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
118
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So the electroweak radiative corrections should be taken into account in the theoretical calculations of the production rate. For the process e + e − → ZH, the leading order calculation was performed in [21] and the oneloop electroweak corrections were calculated with the soft-photon approximation in [22][23][24] (a compact analytical formula for the electromagnetic corrections was given in [23] and a numerical calculation algorithm for the real photon emission was proposed in [25]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So the electroweak radiative corrections should be taken into account in the theoretical calculations of the production rate. For the process e + e − → ZH, the leading order calculation was performed in [21] and the oneloop electroweak corrections were calculated with the soft-photon approximation in [22][23][24] (a compact analytical formula for the electromagnetic corrections was given in [23] and a numerical calculation algorithm for the real photon emission was proposed in [25]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…more than sixty diagrams need to be calculated) and it was shown recently that the total weak correction is 5% for m h = 125GeV and √ s = 240GeV [75]. About the corresponding corrections in the MDM, we have following observations after comparing carefully the SM correction presented in [73] • Although the contribution induced by the Higgs self-coupling is only 2% in the SM [75], it is potentially large in the MDM since the self-couplings among the scalars may be greatly enhanced [44]. In this work, we call such a contribution Type-I correction and will mainly discuss its effect on the production process in the following.…”
Section: Calculations and Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Explicitly speaking, we find by calculation that, in the G µ parametrization discussed in [73], the size of the correction is only about 0.35% in optimal case, which occurs for m t ′ ≃ 1010GeV, sin θ L ≃ 0.24 (corresponding to y ′ ≃ 1.37) and cos θ S ≃ 1. In getting the correction, we compute not only the vertex correction to ZZh interaction with the Feynman diagram shown in panel (i) of figure 2, but also the self energies of SM gauge bosons and the Higgs boson to get the expressions of the counter terms, which are needed to renormalize the ZZh interaction [73]. Therefore the calculation process is rather complicated.…”
Section: Jhep08(2014)138mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The corresponding one-loop amplitudes arise from ZZ and γZ self-energies and counter terms generating renormalized initial and final vertices, triangles (initial and final in schannel, and up and down in t and u channels), direct, crossed and twisted boxes and specific diagrams involving 4-leg bosonic couplings, see [10]. In the MSSM case additional diagrams exist involving supersymmetric partners like sleptons, squarks, charginos, neutralinos and additional Higgses.…”
Section: Electroweak Corrections At One Loopmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process has been considered as the most important one for studying the Higgs boson at e − e + colliders [10]. As we point out below, there are several points that may be added to the previous analyses of this process, even in the SM case [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%