2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.100.054301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electroweak probes of ground state densities

Abstract: Background: Elastic electron scattering has been used for decades to paint the most accurate picture of the proton distribution in atomic nuclei. This stands in stark contrast to the neutron distribution that is traditionally probed using hadronic reactions that are hindered by large uncertainties in the reaction mechanism. Spurred by new experimental developments, it is now possible to gain valuable insights into the neutron distribution using exclusively electroweak probes.Purpose: To assess the information … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
(229 reference statements)
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To reduce the nuclear uncertainties subsumed into F w (q 2 ), either measurements need to be performed at very small momentum transfer, or improved nuclearstructure calculations are required, whose most uncertain part, again related to the neutron distribution in the nucleus, could be constrained in future global analyses of CEνNS and PVES off multiple nuclear targets. At present, ab-initio calculations are becoming available for medium-size nuclei [137], while currently most calculations are based on (relativistic) mean field methods [138][139][140][141][142] and the large-scale nuclear shell model [136,[143][144][145].…”
Section: Coherent Elastic Neutrino-nucleus Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce the nuclear uncertainties subsumed into F w (q 2 ), either measurements need to be performed at very small momentum transfer, or improved nuclearstructure calculations are required, whose most uncertain part, again related to the neutron distribution in the nucleus, could be constrained in future global analyses of CEνNS and PVES off multiple nuclear targets. At present, ab-initio calculations are becoming available for medium-size nuclei [137], while currently most calculations are based on (relativistic) mean field methods [138][139][140][141][142] and the large-scale nuclear shell model [136,[143][144][145].…”
Section: Coherent Elastic Neutrino-nucleus Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Nuclear level. For the central values, we average over eight available nuclear calculations for f p and f n [116,117,186,187]. At small momentum transfer, we estimate the theoretical uncertainty using the small Q 2 expansion in terms of pointnucleon radii R p = 3.338 ± 0.003 fm, R n = 3.406 ± 0.046 fm [169,187,188], 10 i.e.…”
Section: Cross Sections and Uncertainties For A Monoenergetic Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At larger momentum transfer, we take the largest difference between the theoretical calculations of [116,117,186,187,189]. At intermediate region, we take the minimum of these two estimates.…”
Section: Cross Sections and Uncertainties For A Monoenergetic Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nuclear form factor related to weak interactions plays a dominant role in the accurate description of neutrino-matter interactions [34] motivating further the necessity of revisiting the relevant nuclear parameters (see Refs. [35,36]). While neutrinos are a valuable tool for deep sky investigations [37], nuclear parameters such as the neutron skin can be crucial for understanding neutron star dynamics [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%