2006
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.74.114017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electroweak gauge boson production at hadron colliders throughO(αs2)

Abstract: We describe a calculation of the O(α 2 s ) QCD corrections to the fully differential cross section for W and Z boson production in hadronic collisions. The result is fully realistic in that it includes spin correlations, finite width effects, γ − Z interference and allows for the application of arbitrary cuts on the leptonic decay products of the W and Z. We have implemented this calculation into a numerical program. We demonstrate the use of this code by presenting phenomenological results for several future … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
622
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 655 publications
(630 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
8
622
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MLM matching scheme is used to remove overlaps between the n and n þ 1 parton samples [38]. The CTEQ6L1 PDF [39,40] set is used and the cross-section is normalized to the NNLO prediction [41]. Parton showering and hadronization are modeled by Herwig and the underlying event is simulated by Jimmy.…”
Section: Atlas Detector and Data Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MLM matching scheme is used to remove overlaps between the n and n þ 1 parton samples [38]. The CTEQ6L1 PDF [39,40] set is used and the cross-section is normalized to the NNLO prediction [41]. Parton showering and hadronization are modeled by Herwig and the underlying event is simulated by Jimmy.…”
Section: Atlas Detector and Data Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To minimise model-dependent theoretical uncertainties, the cross-section is not extrapolated to the full phase space but is reported in a phase space only slightly extended with respect to the fiducial acceptance of the e + and e − . The results are compared to NNLO pQCD calculations with next-to-leading-order (NLO) electroweak corrections from the FEWZ 3.1 [10,11] framework and to the predictions from three event generators. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, CDR is also used in existing fully differential next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) computations [13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Its use in such situations is much less natural.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%